H.R. 2348 (119th)Bill Overview

Brake for Kids Act of 2025

Transportation and Public Works|Transportation and Public Works
Cosponsors
Support
Bipartisan
Introduced
Mar 25, 2025
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Referred to the Subcommittee on Highways and Transit.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief
Plain-English summaryWhat this bill actually does

The Brake for Kids Act of 2025 directs the Secretary of Transportation to produce and distribute a national public safety campaign about the dangers of illegally passing stopped school buses. It requires use of funds provided under the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act and mandates television, radio, social media, and edge service advertising, ensuring the campaign is not limited to digital downloads or regional distribution.

Why people may split

Liberal emphasizes equity and robust outreach to underserved communities

Watch point

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a concise administrative directive that clearly defines the problem and identifies the responsible official and funding source, and it specifies required media channels for a national public safety campaign.

The Brake for Kids Act of 2025 directs the Secretary of Transportation to produce and distribute a national public safety campaign about the dangers of illegally passing stopped school buses.

It requires use of funds provided under the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act and mandates television, radio, social media, and edge service advertising, ensuring the campaign is not limited to digital downloads or regional distribution.

Passage55/100

Content is narrow and bipartisan-friendly, improving chances, but many simple bills still stall in committee or need packaging into larger legislation.

CredibilityPartially aligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a concise administrative directive that clearly defines the problem and identifies the responsible official and funding source, and it specifies required media channels for a national public safety campaign. It lacks operational detail such as timelines, performance measures, reporting requirements, procurement or coordination instructions, and specified funding amounts.

Contention25/100

Liberal emphasizes equity and robust outreach to underserved communities

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Likely benefits vs burdens50% / 50%
Schools · Federal agenciesLocal governments

These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.

Likely helped
  • SchoolsIncreases public awareness about dangers of illegally passing stopped school buses, potentially reducing child injuries…
  • Potential benefitReaches diverse audiences through TV, radio, social media, and edge services, improving message penetration across demo…
  • Federal agenciesUses existing Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act funds, avoiding a new dedicated federal tax or appropriation.
Likely burdened
  • Potential burdenEffectiveness is uncertain because behavioral change from advertising is hard to measure.
  • Local governmentsMay duplicate existing state and local school-bus safety campaigns, causing redundancy.
  • Potential burdenDiverts IIJA discretionary funds from infrastructure projects or other transportation priorities.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Liberal emphasizes equity and robust outreach to underserved communities
Progressive90%

Overall supportive: child safety is a clear public-good priority.

Sees federal public-education campaigns as appropriate to reduce injuries and deaths.

Would want strong outreach to underserved, non-English, and rural communities.

Leans supportive
Centrist80%

Generally supportive but pragmatic.

Sees value in national education to improve safety while wanting clear budgeting, oversight, and measurable outcomes.

Prefers coordination with state and local enforcement resources.

Leans supportive
Conservative60%

Cautiously supportive on principle because it promotes child safety, but wary of federal message campaigns and use of IIJA funds for advertising.

Prefers state-led efforts and tighter spending limits.

Split reaction
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood55/100

Content is narrow and bipartisan-friendly, improving chances, but many simple bills still stall in committee or need packaging into larger legislation.

Scope and complexity
24%
Scopenarrow
24%
Complexitylow
Why this could stall
  • Exact amount and availability of IIJA funds for this purpose
  • Agency timeline and performance metrics are unspecified
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Liberal emphasizes equity and robust outreach to underserved communities

Content is narrow and bipartisan-friendly, improving chances, but many simple bills still stall in committee or need packaging into larger…

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a concise administrative directive that clearly defines the problem and identifies the responsible official and funding source, and it specifies required media cha…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis