Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources.
This bill adds the Scarper Ridge property to the Golden Gate National Recreation Area by amending the park boundary description to include land shown on a specified July 2024 map (Map No. 641/193973). The text only changes the statutory boundary; it does not itself appropriate funds, describe acquisition methods, or specify management changes.
Environmental protection and public access versus federal jurisdiction concerns
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a narrowly focused statutory amendment that clearly states its purpose and integrates with the existing code by referencing a numbered map.
This bill adds the Scarper Ridge property to the Golden Gate National Recreation Area by amending the park boundary description to include land shown on a specified July 2024 map (Map No. 641/193973).
The text only changes the statutory boundary; it does not itself appropriate funds, describe acquisition methods, or specify management changes.
Content is narrow and administrative so it is plausible to become law, but absence of funding/acquisition language and need for committee and procedural clearance create uncertainty.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a narrowly focused statutory amendment that clearly states its purpose and integrates with the existing code by referencing a numbered map. It is specific in its legal insertion but omits practical implementation, fiscal, and property-acquisition details that would normally accompany a boundary-addition statute.
Environmental protection and public access versus federal jurisdiction concerns
These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.
Environmental protection and public access versus federal jurisdiction concerns
Likely supportive: enlarging a national recreation area aligns with conservation, public access, and habitat protection goals.
Support depends on assurances about public access, ecological protections, and consultation with local communities and tribes; funding and acquisition details are not specified and remain uncertain.
Cautiously supportive if practical issues are addressed: expanding a recreation area is reasonable, but clarity is needed on ownership, costs, and management responsibilities.
The bill is procedural in nature, so many impacts are speculative without follow-up legislation or agency actions.
Likely skeptical or opposed: expanding federal land holdings raises concerns about federal overreach, long-term management costs, and restrictions on private or local land use.
Opposition is stronger if acquisition would require federal purchases or reduce local control; exact impacts are uncertain from the bill text.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Content is narrow and administrative so it is plausible to become law, but absence of funding/acquisition language and need for committee and procedural clearance create uncertainty.
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Environmental protection and public access versus federal jurisdiction concerns
Content is narrow and administrative so it is plausible to become law, but absence of funding/acquisition language and need for committee a…
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a narrowly focused statutory amendment that clearly states its purpose and integrates with the existing code by referencing a numbered map. It is specific in its l…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.