H.R. 2377 (119th)Bill Overview

National Garden for America’s 250th Anniversary Act

Public Lands and Natural Resources|Public Lands and Natural Resources
Cosponsors
Support
Republican
Introduced
Mar 26, 2025
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief
Plain-English summaryWhat this bill actually does

This bill authorizes the White House Task Force on Celebrating America’s 250th Birthday to establish the National Garden of American Heroes, a statuary park described in prior Executive Orders. It allows siting in the Reserve or acquisition of non‑Federal land, permits commemorating any individual or group, creates a Treasury National Garden Fund for private contributions and investments, and requires frequent reports to Congress.

Why people may split

Progressives emphasize politicization and lack of selection criteria

Watch point

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill provides a clear authorization and a reasonably detailed legal framework for creating the National Garden of American Heroes: it confers authorities, creates a dedicated fund, specifies roles and a deadline, and mandates frequent reporting.

This bill authorizes the White House Task Force on Celebrating America’s 250th Birthday to establish the National Garden of American Heroes, a statuary park described in prior Executive Orders.

It allows siting in the Reserve or acquisition of non‑Federal land, permits commemorating any individual or group, creates a Treasury National Garden Fund for private contributions and investments, and requires frequent reports to Congress.

The Secretary of the Interior must approve the location, construction should commence by July 4, 2026 if practicable, and the National Park Service will maintain the Garden once opened, with an option to charge visitation fees for maintenance if funds are insufficient.

Passage35/100

Narrow administrative bill with low direct cost but high symbolic controversy; House-level passage plausible, Senate passage and final enactment less likely.

CredibilityPartially aligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill provides a clear authorization and a reasonably detailed legal framework for creating the National Garden of American Heroes: it confers authorities, creates a dedicated fund, specifies roles and a deadline, and mandates frequent reporting. However, it delegates significant discretion to the Task Force, lacks fiscal appropriation or cost estimates, and omits detailed safeguards and selection/acceptance criteria for contributions and honorees.

Contention68/100

Progressives emphasize politicization and lack of selection criteria

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Likely benefits vs burdens50% / 50%
Local governments · Federal agenciesFederal agencies

These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.

Likely helped
  • Potential benefitCreates construction and maintenance jobs during planning and building phases.
  • Local governmentsCould attract tourism and local economic activity once open.
  • Federal agenciesEnables private fundraising reducing immediate federal appropriations.
Likely burdened
  • Federal agenciesPotential federal expenses if private contributions and fund earnings are insufficient.
  • Potential burdenRisk of politicized selection of honorees because any individual may be commemorated.
  • Potential burdenPossible environmental and land-use impacts from construction and land acquisition.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Progressives emphasize politicization and lack of selection criteria
Progressive25%

Likely skeptical of the bill given broad authority to honor "any individual or group" and placement in the Reserve.

Concern will focus on selection criteria, potential glorification of controversial figures, and donor influence.

Support might be possible if strict transparency, inclusive selection, and strong environmental and community safeguards are added.

Likely resistant
Centrist55%

Cautiously mixed: supports commemorating national history and using private funds, but worried about execution, costs, administrative oversight, and feasibility of the tight timeline.

Would seek clearer selection processes, accountability, and environmental compliance before full endorsement.

Split reaction
Conservative85%

Likely supportive: views bill as a federal endorsement to honor American heroes, aligns with building monuments and celebrating national heritage.

Private funding and ability to site in the Reserve are attractive, though some may push for faster implementation or broader honoree lists.

Leans supportive
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood35/100

Narrow administrative bill with low direct cost but high symbolic controversy; House-level passage plausible, Senate passage and final enactment less likely.

Scope and complexity
52%
Scopemoderate
24%
Complexitylow
Why this could stall
  • Amount and sufficiency of private contributions
  • Political reaction to chosen honorees
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Progressives emphasize politicization and lack of selection criteria

Narrow administrative bill with low direct cost but high symbolic controversy; House-level passage plausible, Senate passage and final enac…

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill provides a clear authorization and a reasonably detailed legal framework for creating the National Garden of American Heroes: it confers authorities, creates a dedica…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis