Referred to the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.
This bill requires executive agencies (excluding intelligence community elements for full public disclosure) to complete a comprehensive inventory and assessment of software paid for, used, or deployed, including entitlements, contracts, costs, and interoperability. Agencies must produce modernization plans to consolidate licenses, improve asset management, adopt cost-effective acquisition strategies, train staff, and restrict sub‑agency software purchases without CIO approval.
Liberty/left emphasizes transparency, savings, and open‑source opportunities
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a well-specified administrative/operational measure with strong definitional clarity, specific mechanisms, and a clear implementation timeline, supplemented by reporting requirements.
This bill requires executive agencies (excluding intelligence community elements for full public disclosure) to complete a comprehensive inventory and assessment of software paid for, used, or deployed, including entitlements, contracts, costs, and interoperability.
Agencies must produce modernization plans to consolidate licenses, improve asset management, adopt cost-effective acquisition strategies, train staff, and restrict sub‑agency software purchases without CIO approval.
OMB and GSA must coordinate common definitions and report recommendations; GAO must report on government‑wide trends within three years.
Low-ideology, technical oversight bills often advance; implementation costs and competing legislative priorities create uncertainty.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a well-specified administrative/operational measure with strong definitional clarity, specific mechanisms, and a clear implementation timeline, supplemented by reporting requirements.
Liberty/left emphasizes transparency, savings, and open‑source opportunities
These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.
Liberty/left emphasizes transparency, savings, and open‑source opportunities
Likely supportive overall because the bill increases transparency, reduces waste, and explicitly mentions enterprise and open‑source options.
Views improved interoperability and license consolidation as positive for accountability, access, and potentially security.
May flag concerns about centralization favoring large vendors and the absence of new funding for implementation.
Generally favorable as a pragmatic effort to reduce waste and improve oversight, while preserving agency accountability.
Sees value in standardized definitions and GAO review.
Concerned about implementation costs, timelines, and operational impacts given no additional funds authorized.
Mixed to somewhat skeptical: supports reducing waste and improving procurement efficiency but wary of increased centralization of acquisition authority.
Concerned about federal overreach, reduced bureau flexibility, and added compliance costs.
Views lack of new spending favorably, but worries about regulatory expansion.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Low-ideology, technical oversight bills often advance; implementation costs and competing legislative priorities create uncertainty.
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Liberty/left emphasizes transparency, savings, and open‑source opportunities
Low-ideology, technical oversight bills often advance; implementation costs and competing legislative priorities create uncertainty.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a well-specified administrative/operational measure with strong definitional clarity, specific mechanisms, and a clear implementation timeline, supplemented by rep…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.