Referred to the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.
The bill amends existing federal employee survey law to require each Executive agency to conduct an annual manager survey. The survey must ask specific questions about managers' confidence in disciplining employees, support and training, probationary periods, input on labor negotiations, and morale/retention impacts; narrative responses must be allowed.
Left worries the focus on discipline could erode employee protections
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill functions as an administrative/operational statutory amendment that is clear about the requirement to conduct annual manager surveys, the specific questions to be asked, and the entities responsible for implementing regulatory changes, but it omits several operational details needed for full execution.
The bill amends existing federal employee survey law to require each Executive agency to conduct an annual manager survey.
The survey must ask specific questions about managers' confidence in disciplining employees, support and training, probationary periods, input on labor negotiations, and morale/retention impacts; narrative responses must be allowed.
OPM must update implementing regulations within 180 days. "Federal manager" is defined as GS‑13 or above who is a supervisor or management official.
Substantively modest administrative tweak that often can pass, but standalone low‑salience bills frequently stall unless attached to larger measures.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill functions as an administrative/operational statutory amendment that is clear about the requirement to conduct annual manager surveys, the specific questions to be asked, and the entities responsible for implementing regulatory changes, but it omits several operational details needed for full execution.
Left worries the focus on discipline could erode employee protections
These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.
Left worries the focus on discipline could erode employee protections
Cautiously skeptical.
Sees value in identifying training and morale problems, but worries the emphasis on discipline could be used to weaken employee protections or collective bargaining.
Would demand strong safeguards for employee due process and anonymity.
Pragmatic and moderately supportive.
Views the bill as a useful diagnostic tool to improve management, training, and retention, but wants clear standards, cost control, and safeguards to prevent misuse or survey fatigue.
Supportive.
Sees the bill as addressing longstanding managerial inability to discipline poor performers and as creating evidence to reform civil-service protections.
Wants swift implementation and use of results to strengthen accountability.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Substantively modest administrative tweak that often can pass, but standalone low‑salience bills frequently stall unless attached to larger measures.
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Left worries the focus on discipline could erode employee protections
Substantively modest administrative tweak that often can pass, but standalone low‑salience bills frequently stall unless attached to larger…
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill functions as an administrative/operational statutory amendment that is clear about the requirement to conduct annual manager surveys, the specific questions to be ask…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.