H.R. 2427 (119th)Bill Overview

Stop Disaster Price Gouging Act

Emergency Management|Emergency Management
Cosponsors
Support
Democratic
Introduced
Mar 27, 2025
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief
Plain-English summaryWhat this bill actually does

This bill (Stop Disaster Price Gouging Act) prohibits certain price increases for essential goods, services, hotel lodging, residential rentals, and reconstruction services in areas covered by a Presidential major disaster or emergency declaration. It caps post-declaration increases at 10% (short-term) and bars new prices more than 50% above seller cost for 30 days, with exceptions for documented supplier cost increases, tariffs, seasonable hotel adjustments, and some rental adjustments.

Why people may split

Liberal emphasizes consumer protections and private enforcement mechanisms.

Watch point

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a clearly focused substantive statutory change that sets concrete pricing limits during declared disasters and embeds enforcement through the FTC, State attorneys general, and private causes of action.

This bill (Stop Disaster Price Gouging Act) prohibits certain price increases for essential goods, services, hotel lodging, residential rentals, and reconstruction services in areas covered by a Presidential major disaster or emergency declaration.

It caps post-declaration increases at 10% (short-term) and bars new prices more than 50% above seller cost for 30 days, with exceptions for documented supplier cost increases, tariffs, seasonable hotel adjustments, and some rental adjustments.

The Federal Trade Commission enforces the law as an unfair or deceptive practice, States may bring parens patriae actions, and private plaintiffs have a right to sue with possible treble damages for willful violations.

Passage45/100

Text is targeted and administrable, appealing as consumer protection, but litigation exposure, industry pushback, and Senate hurdles lower likelihood.

CredibilityPartially aligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a clearly focused substantive statutory change that sets concrete pricing limits during declared disasters and embeds enforcement through the FTC, State attorneys general, and private causes of action. It integrates with existing law (Stafford Act and FTC Act) and anticipates several exceptions.

Contention66/100

Liberal emphasizes consumer protections and private enforcement mechanisms.

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Likely benefits vs burdens50% / 50%
Consumers · Federal agenciesLikely burdened

These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.

Likely helped
  • ConsumersLimits exploitative price spikes for necessities during declared disasters, protecting consumer purchasing power.
  • Federal agenciesProvides multiple enforcement pathways: federal, state, and private suits to deter unlawful price increases.
  • Potential benefitDirects recovered penalty funds to assist communities in declared disaster areas.
Likely burdened
  • Potential burdenCould impose compliance costs and recordkeeping burdens on sellers and service providers.
  • Potential burdenMay discourage sellers from bringing additional supplies or services into disaster areas, risking shortages.
  • Potential burdenPenalty structure caps total liability for related acts at $25,000, which critics may view as weak deterrence.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Liberal emphasizes consumer protections and private enforcement mechanisms.
Progressive90%

This persona is likely to view the bill favorably as a consumer-protection measure that prevents exploitative pricing after disasters.

They will emphasize protections for vulnerable households during emergencies and like enforcement via the FTC plus private and state enforcement paths.

They may press for robust implementation and wide scope for essential goods definitions.

Leans supportive
Centrist70%

A pragmatic centrist would generally support the bill's goal of preventing price gouging while wanting clearer implementation mechanics and balanced enforcement.

They will appreciate FTC enforcement and state/private enforcement but worry about compliance burdens on small businesses and ambiguous exception standards.

They may favor modest technical fixes to definitions, penalty structure, and evidentiary standards.

Leans supportive
Conservative25%

This persona will be skeptical, viewing the bill as federal price control that interferes with market signals during crises.

They will argue caps can discourage supply delivery, create shortages, and expand FTC authority over commerce.

They may nonetheless note the bill includes exceptions and modest penalty caps, but still prefer state-driven responses or narrowly tailored federal measures.

Likely resistant
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood45/100

Text is targeted and administrable, appealing as consumer protection, but litigation exposure, industry pushback, and Senate hurdles lower likelihood.

Scope and complexity
52%
Scopemoderate
52%
Complexitymedium
Why this could stall
  • Level of industry and business lobbying resistance
  • FTC resource implications and willingness to prioritize enforcement
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Liberal emphasizes consumer protections and private enforcement mechanisms.

Text is targeted and administrable, appealing as consumer protection, but litigation exposure, industry pushback, and Senate hurdles lower…

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a clearly focused substantive statutory change that sets concrete pricing limits during declared disasters and embeds enforcement through the FTC, State attorneys…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis