H.R. 2436 (119th)Bill Overview

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to treat distributions from health savings accounts for funeral expenses of the account beneficiary as qualified distributions.

Taxation|Taxation
Cosponsors
Support
Lean Republican
Introduced
Mar 27, 2025
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief
Plain-English summaryWhat this bill actually does

The bill amends Internal Revenue Code section 223 to treat Health Savings Account (HSA) distributions used to pay funeral expenses of the account beneficiary as qualified (tax-free) distributions. It defines “funeral expenses,” lists covered items, caps aggregate funeral reimbursements at $5,000 per beneficiary, and allows funeral expenses paid within 90 days after death to be treated as incurred before death.

Why people may split

Liberal emphasizes regressivity and prefers direct targeted aid

Watch point

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a narrowly focused and technically specific amendment to the Internal Revenue Code that clearly defines the new qualified distribution category, integrates into the relevant IRC provisions, and limits scope with a monetary cap and timing rule.

The bill amends Internal Revenue Code section 223 to treat Health Savings Account (HSA) distributions used to pay funeral expenses of the account beneficiary as qualified (tax-free) distributions.

It defines “funeral expenses,” lists covered items, caps aggregate funeral reimbursements at $5,000 per beneficiary, and allows funeral expenses paid within 90 days after death to be treated as incurred before death.

The changes apply to amounts paid after enactment in taxable years ending after that date.

Passage55/100

Small, administrable expansion of HSA use with limited fiscal impact and few ideological objections, but requires committee action and broader legislative vehicle.

CredibilityAligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a narrowly focused and technically specific amendment to the Internal Revenue Code that clearly defines the new qualified distribution category, integrates into the relevant IRC provisions, and limits scope with a monetary cap and timing rule.

Contention30/100

Liberal emphasizes regressivity and prefers direct targeted aid

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Likely benefits vs burdens50% / 50%
FamiliesFederal agencies

These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.

Likely helped
  • FamiliesAllows tax-free HSA distributions for funeral expenses up to $5,000, reducing immediate family out-of-pocket costs.
  • Potential benefitProvides statutory definition of qualifying funeral expenses, giving clearer guidance to account holders and administra…
  • Potential benefitTreats funeral costs paid within 90 days after death as incurred before death, easing executor timing pressures.
Likely burdened
  • Federal agenciesReduces federal tax receipts relative to current law, with uncertain fiscal magnitude.
  • Potential burdenBenefits accrue only to individuals with HSAs, potentially favoring higher-income households.
  • Potential burdenIntroduces additional compliance and recordkeeping responsibilities for HSA custodians and the IRS.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Liberal emphasizes regressivity and prefers direct targeted aid
Progressive65%

Likely supportive of relieving families from immediate funeral costs, but cautious about expanding HSA tax advantages.

Concerned HSAs disproportionately benefit higher-income people, so this is viewed as a regressive tax expenditure rather than direct aid.

Split reaction
Centrist80%

Seen as a modest, administratively simple change that reduces family burdens and has bipartisan appeal.

Wants fiscal estimates and clear guardrails to prevent unintended tax subsidies or administrative confusion.

Leans supportive
Conservative80%

Likely supportive as a limited expansion of individual choice and family flexibility, with modest fiscal exposure.

May prefer private solutions to funeral hardship over new government programs.

Leans supportive
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood55/100

Small, administrable expansion of HSA use with limited fiscal impact and few ideological objections, but requires committee action and broader legislative vehicle.

Scope and complexity
24%
Scopenarrow
24%
Complexitylow
Why this could stall
  • Absent CBO/JCT score and estimated revenue loss
  • Committee willingness to advance stand-alone tax change
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Liberal emphasizes regressivity and prefers direct targeted aid

Small, administrable expansion of HSA use with limited fiscal impact and few ideological objections, but requires committee action and broa…

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a narrowly focused and technically specific amendment to the Internal Revenue Code that clearly defines the new qualified distribution category, integrates into th…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis