Received in the Senate. Read twice. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 62.
Establishes a Commerce-led program to assess, map, and strengthen critical supply chains and emerging technologies. Creates a multi-agency Supply Chain Resilience Working Group, requires designation of critical industries/goods, regular strategy reports, confidentiality protections for voluntarily submitted information, a Commerce capability assessment, and a 10-year sunset.
Liberals seek stronger funding, labor, and environmental safeguards
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a detailed administrative/operational measure that prescribes a concrete program architecture (Working Group, duties for the Assistant Secretary, membership, timelines, reports, and statutory definitions) and includes explicit protections for voluntarily submitted supply chain information.
Establishes a Commerce-led program to assess, map, and strengthen critical supply chains and emerging technologies.
Creates a multi-agency Supply Chain Resilience Working Group, requires designation of critical industries/goods, regular strategy reports, confidentiality protections for voluntarily submitted information, a Commerce capability assessment, and a 10-year sunset.
No new appropriations are authorized.
Content is largely technocratic and modestly resourced, increasing viability; key friction points (disclosure protections, international implications, Senate procedure) leave moderate uncertainty.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a detailed administrative/operational measure that prescribes a concrete program architecture (Working Group, duties for the Assistant Secretary, membership, timelines, reports, and statutory definitions) and includes explicit protections for voluntarily submitted supply chain information.
Liberals seek stronger funding, labor, and environmental safeguards
These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.
Liberals seek stronger funding, labor, and environmental safeguards
Likely supportive of efforts to rebuild domestic manufacturing, secure emerging-technology supply chains, and create manufacturing jobs.
Concerned that the bill authorizes planning but lacks funding, and worries transparency and labor/environmental standards are insufficient.
Generally favorable to a coordinated, analytic federal approach to supply chain resilience and technology leadership.
Wary that the bill relies on voluntary cooperation and authorizes no new funds, which could limit implementation and create duplication without clear metrics.
Likely supportive because it advances national security, reduces reliance on risky foreign suppliers, and encourages reshoring to the U.S. and allies.
Favors the bill's voluntary approach, confidentiality protections, and lack of new spending, but cautious about growth of federal oversight.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Content is largely technocratic and modestly resourced, increasing viability; key friction points (disclosure protections, international implications, Senate procedure) leave moderate uncertainty.
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Liberals seek stronger funding, labor, and environmental safeguards
Content is largely technocratic and modestly resourced, increasing viability; key friction points (disclosure protections, international im…
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a detailed administrative/operational measure that prescribes a concrete program architecture (Working Group, duties for the Assistant Secretary, membership, timel…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.