Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.
The bill bars issuance of licenses or waivers for transactions involving certain Iranian persons designated under Executive Order 13224, unless the President certifies to four Congressional committees that those persons have ceased involvement in terrorism. It applies to Iranian individuals and entities listed on the OFAC Specially Designated Nationals list as of January 20, 2021.
Progressives emphasize diplomacy and humanitarian risks.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a narrowly focused substantive policy change that prescribes a categorical prohibition on licenses or waivers for transactions with a defined set of sanctioned Iranian persons unless the President certifies cessation of involvement in terrorism.
The bill bars issuance of licenses or waivers for transactions involving certain Iranian persons designated under Executive Order 13224, unless the President certifies to four Congressional committees that those persons have ceased involvement in terrorism.
It applies to Iranian individuals and entities listed on the OFAC Specially Designated Nationals list as of January 20, 2021.
A rule of construction preserves any OFAC general license in effect on January 20, 2021 and does not alter those licenses.
Short, targeted bill with low fiscal impact improves prospects in one chamber, but executive‑authority concerns and Senate hurdles lower ultimate odds.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a narrowly focused substantive policy change that prescribes a categorical prohibition on licenses or waivers for transactions with a defined set of sanctioned Iranian persons unless the President certifies cessation of involvement in terrorism. The bill clearly defines the covered population and identifies the oversight committees, and it preserves pre-existing general licenses as of a specific date.
Progressives emphasize diplomacy and humanitarian risks.
These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.
Progressives emphasize diplomacy and humanitarian risks.
Views are mixed: supportive of preventing aid to terrorism, but concerned the bill constrains diplomatic flexibility and humanitarian channels.
Worries about tying the President’s hands in negotiations with Iran and potential unintended harms to civilians.
Sees reasonable intent in blocking relief for terrorism-linked actors but worries about unintended limits on executive flexibility.
Values oversight but wants narrow, practical implementation to avoid harming legitimate diplomacy or humanitarian activity.
Likely supportive because it tightens restrictions on dealings with terror-designated Iranian actors and increases Congressional control over sanction relief.
Views it as strengthening national security and accountability.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Short, targeted bill with low fiscal impact improves prospects in one chamber, but executive‑authority concerns and Senate hurdles lower ultimate odds.
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Progressives emphasize diplomacy and humanitarian risks.
Short, targeted bill with low fiscal impact improves prospects in one chamber, but executive‑authority concerns and Senate hurdles lower ul…
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a narrowly focused substantive policy change that prescribes a categorical prohibition on licenses or waivers for transactions with a defined set of sanctioned Ira…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.