Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
This bill creates a grant program within the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act to fund behavioral health crisis response training for state, local, and Tribal law enforcement and corrections officers. The Attorney General would set qualification standards, may reserve up to $10 million for the program, and award grants that can cover training, transportation, and lodging.
Role of police versus funding civilian crisis responders
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a clear, narrowly tailored substantive grant-authorizing statute that integrates into existing law and establishes basic controls and reporting.
This bill creates a grant program within the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act to fund behavioral health crisis response training for state, local, and Tribal law enforcement and corrections officers.
The Attorney General would set qualification standards, may reserve up to $10 million for the program, and award grants that can cover training, transportation, and lodging.
Recipients must report annually, keep records for audit, and may not use more than 3% of a grant for administrative costs.
Modest-to-fair chance: technically straightforward and nonpolarizing, but success depends on appropriations, committee action, and floor scheduling.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a clear, narrowly tailored substantive grant-authorizing statute that integrates into existing law and establishes basic controls and reporting. It articulates the problem and purpose well but leaves many operational and evaluation particulars to agency implementation.
Role of police versus funding civilian crisis responders
These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.
Role of police versus funding civilian crisis responders
Generally supportive of training that reduces harm to people with mental illness and improves de-escalation.
Concerned the bill may cement police as primary crisis responders rather than expanding non‑police alternatives; impact on outcomes depends on curricula and implementation, which is uncertain.
Likely supportive as a targeted, modest federal measure to improve officer and public safety during mental health crises.
Views the bill as practical but wants clear performance metrics, careful oversight, and enough funding to test effectiveness before large expansion.
Cautiously supportive of training that improves officer safety and public order, but wary of added federal involvement and prescriptive standards.
Concerned about federal funding influencing local policing policy and potential ideological content in curricula.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Modest-to-fair chance: technically straightforward and nonpolarizing, but success depends on appropriations, committee action, and floor scheduling.
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Role of police versus funding civilian crisis responders
Modest-to-fair chance: technically straightforward and nonpolarizing, but success depends on appropriations, committee action, and floor sc…
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a clear, narrowly tailored substantive grant-authorizing statute that integrates into existing law and establishes basic controls and reporting. It articulates the…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.