H.R. 2507 (119th)Bill Overview

Helping to Encourage Real Opportunities (HERO) for Youth Act of 2025

Taxation|Taxation
Cosponsors
Support
Democratic
Introduced
Mar 31, 2025
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief
Plain-English summaryWhat this bill actually does

The bill amends the Internal Revenue Code work opportunity tax credit (WOTC). It (1) modifies the ‘‘summer youth’’ eligibility to allow certain part‑time, school‑year employment and adjusts related timing rules, (2) changes the statutory treatment of the credit amount for those youth (text removes and redesignates subparagraphs), and (3) creates a new ‘‘disconnected youth’’ WOTC category for certified youths (16–24 with recent disengagement from school and work) and certain former foster youth (16–20).

Why people may split

Liberals emphasize equity and opportunity for disconnected youth.

Watch point

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a straightforward statutory amendment to the Internal Revenue Code to expand eligibility for and modify the operation of the work opportunity credit for certain youth.

The bill amends the Internal Revenue Code work opportunity tax credit (WOTC).

It (1) modifies the ‘‘summer youth’’ eligibility to allow certain part‑time, school‑year employment and adjusts related timing rules, (2) changes the statutory treatment of the credit amount for those youth (text removes and redesignates subparagraphs), and (3) creates a new ‘‘disconnected youth’’ WOTC category for certified youths (16–24 with recent disengagement from school and work) and certain former foster youth (16–20).

Amendments apply to individuals who begin work after enactment.

Passage45/100

Modest, technically focused expansion of an existing credit increases chance, but revenue impact and need for a legislative vehicle reduce it.

CredibilityPartially aligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a straightforward statutory amendment to the Internal Revenue Code to expand eligibility for and modify the operation of the work opportunity credit for certain youth. It locates changes within the correct statutory provisions and supplies specific insertion and redesignation language, but contains drafting roughness and leaves several operational and fiscal details to implementing agencies.

Contention65/100

Liberals emphasize equity and opportunity for disconnected youth.

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Likely benefits vs burdens50% / 50%
StudentsFederal agencies · Local governments

These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.

Likely helped
  • StudentsIncreases employer incentives to hire secondary students during the school year and summer.
  • Potential benefitExpands hiring opportunities for disconnected youth and foster youth transitioning to employment.
  • Potential benefitMay boost short-term youth employment and on-the-job skill development.
Likely burdened
  • Federal agenciesIncreases potential federal revenue losses depending on employer uptake of expanded credits.
  • Local governmentsRaises administrative burdens for employers and designated local agencies to certify and document eligibility.
  • Potential burdenCreates opportunities for incorrect claims or gaming because of self-certification elements.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Liberals emphasize equity and opportunity for disconnected youth.
Progressive90%

Likely broadly supportive.

The bill targets disadvantaged young people and foster youth, expanding incentives for employers to hire them and potentially increasing work opportunities.

Support would be stronger if accompanied by program oversight and measures protecting wages and training.

Leans supportive
Centrist65%

Cautiously favorable but inquisitive.

The concept of incentivizing employers to hire disconnected youth is pragmatic, but the bill lacks explicit credit amounts and fiscal offsets in the text provided.

Support likely depends on cost estimates, administrative clarity, and evidence of effectiveness.

Split reaction
Conservative30%

Skeptical overall.

While favoring private hiring incentives in principle, conservatives will worry about expanding tax‑credit programs, potential employer windfalls, and added federal certification.

Support could exist if tightly targeted and fiscally offset.

Likely resistant
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood45/100

Modest, technically focused expansion of an existing credit increases chance, but revenue impact and need for a legislative vehicle reduce it.

Scope and complexity
24%
Scopenarrow
52%
Complexitymedium
Why this could stall
  • No official cost estimate or revenue impact included
  • How changes interact with existing WOTC administrative rules
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Liberals emphasize equity and opportunity for disconnected youth.

Modest, technically focused expansion of an existing credit increases chance, but revenue impact and need for a legislative vehicle reduce…

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a straightforward statutory amendment to the Internal Revenue Code to expand eligibility for and modify the operation of the work opportunity credit for certain yo…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis