Referred to the Subcommittee on Economic Development, Public Buildings, and Emergency Management.
The bill amends the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act to specify that, when determining eligibility for FEMA temporary housing assistance (section 408), the President may not treat insurance proceeds as a duplication of benefits for purposes of section 312.
Liberals prioritize rapid survivor assistance and reduced administrative barriers.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a narrow, well-specified statutory amendment that directly prohibits treating insurance as a duplication of benefits for temporary housing assistance under the Stafford Act.
The bill amends the Robert T.
Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act to specify that, when determining eligibility for FEMA temporary housing assistance (section 408), the President may not treat insurance proceeds as a duplication of benefits for purposes of section 312.
In short, insurance payments cannot be used to offset or deny FEMA temporary housing assistance under this provision.
Narrow, implementable change with modest costs improves prospects, but fiscal impact and stakeholder pushback reduce chances.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a narrow, well-specified statutory amendment that directly prohibits treating insurance as a duplication of benefits for temporary housing assistance under the Stafford Act. The operative legal text is concise and unambiguous.
Liberals prioritize rapid survivor assistance and reduced administrative barriers.
These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.
Liberals prioritize rapid survivor assistance and reduced administrative barriers.
Likely views the bill positively as a narrow, practical fix that helps disaster survivors access immediate housing help even if they have insurance.
Sees it as preventing technical denials when insurance is delayed, inadequate, or hard to access.
Views the bill as a targeted humanitarian measure but wants fiscal and program integrity safeguards.
Supports helping people quickly but worries about duplication, cost, and insurer coordination.
Likely opposes the bill as expanding federal spending and allowing duplicative benefits.
Prefers coordination with private insurance and tighter rules to avoid moral hazard and fiscal cost.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Narrow, implementable change with modest costs improves prospects, but fiscal impact and stakeholder pushback reduce chances.
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Liberals prioritize rapid survivor assistance and reduced administrative barriers.
Narrow, implementable change with modest costs improves prospects, but fiscal impact and stakeholder pushback reduce chances.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a narrow, well-specified statutory amendment that directly prohibits treating insurance as a duplication of benefits for temporary housing assistance under the Sta…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.