H.R. 2546 (119th)Bill Overview

Secretary of the Coast Guard Act of 2025

Transportation and Public Works|Transportation and Public Works
Cosponsors
Support
Republican
Introduced
Apr 1, 2025
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Referred to the Subcommittee on Coast Guard and Maritime Transportation.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief
Plain-English summaryWhat this bill actually does

The bill creates a new statutory position titled "Secretary of the Coast Guard," appointed by the President with Senate confirmation. It defines the Secretary's authority to exercise powers referenced in section 501, requires the Coast Guard Commandant to report to this Secretary, and specifies that this Secretary will report directly to the department Secretary without intermediaries.

Why people may split

Whether the new Secretary improves accountability or creates politicized leadership

Watch point

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill provides a concise statutory foundation for creating a Secretary of the Coast Guard (appointment, basic reporting, and placement in Title 14) but is thin on implementation, clarity, and safeguards.

The bill creates a new statutory position titled "Secretary of the Coast Guard," appointed by the President with Senate confirmation.

It defines the Secretary's authority to exercise powers referenced in section 501, requires the Coast Guard Commandant to report to this Secretary, and specifies that this Secretary will report directly to the department Secretary without intermediaries.

The bill also renumbers and updates adjacent section headings in Title 14.

Passage40/100

Technocratic, low‑cost reform raises limited policy objections but faces confirmation politics and drafting ambiguities that could slow enactment.

CredibilityPartially aligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill provides a concise statutory foundation for creating a Secretary of the Coast Guard (appointment, basic reporting, and placement in Title 14) but is thin on implementation, clarity, and safeguards.

Contention46/100

Whether the new Secretary improves accountability or creates politicized leadership

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Likely benefits vs burdens50% / 50%
Likely helpedFederal agencies

These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.

Likely helped
  • Potential benefitEstablishes a single civilian official responsible for Coast Guard policy and oversight, clarifying leadership lines.
  • Potential benefitMay improve operational accountability by making the Commandant report directly to a designated Secretary.
  • Potential benefitCould speed decision-making on maritime security and safety by centralizing authority in one office.
Likely burdened
  • Federal agenciesCreates a new confirmed leadership position that may increase federal personnel costs and administrative overhead.
  • Potential burdenCould duplicate or overlap authority with existing department officials, creating potential bureaucratic friction.
  • Potential burdenAdds a Senate confirmation requirement that may politicize leadership selection and delay appointments.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Whether the new Secretary improves accountability or creates politicized leadership
Progressive65%

Likely cautious-leaning supportive: sees potential for clearer civilian oversight and stronger leadership for maritime safety and environmental enforcement, but worries about politicization and budget impacts.

Will want guarantees on civil rights, environmental enforcement, and protections against misuse of expanded authority.

Split reaction
Centrist55%

Pragmatic and cautious: appreciates clearer chain-of-command and accountability via Senate confirmation, but wants clarity on duties, reporting relationships, costs, and overlap with existing authorities.

Likely to support with statutory fixes and cost transparency.

Split reaction
Conservative75%

Generally favorable if it strengthens maritime security, border enforcement, and a clear chain of command; may oppose if it increases federal bureaucracy or costs unnecessarily.

Conservative supporters will value a strong confirmed leader focused on operational readiness.

Leans supportive
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood40/100

Technocratic, low‑cost reform raises limited policy objections but faces confirmation politics and drafting ambiguities that could slow enactment.

Scope and complexity
24%
Scopenarrow
24%
Complexitylow
Why this could stall
  • Whether Congress intends this as a cabinet‑level post or department subpost
  • Impact on Department of Homeland Security statutory structure
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Whether the new Secretary improves accountability or creates politicized leadership

Technocratic, low‑cost reform raises limited policy objections but faces confirmation politics and drafting ambiguities that could slow ena…

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill provides a concise statutory foundation for creating a Secretary of the Coast Guard (appointment, basic reporting, and placement in Title 14) but is thin on implement…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis