H.R. 255 (119th)Bill Overview

To name the Department of Veterans Affairs community-based outpatient clinic in Lubbock, Texas, as the "General Bernie Mittemeyer VA Clinic".

Armed Forces and National Security|Armed Forces and National SecurityCongressional tributes
Cosponsors
Support
Republican
Introduced
Jan 9, 2025
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Referred to the Subcommittee on Health.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief
Plain-English summaryWhat this bill actually does

This bill renames the Department of Veterans Affairs community-based outpatient clinic in Lubbock, Texas, as the "General Bernie Mittemeyer VA Clinic." It also requires that any reference to that clinic in federal materials use the new name.

Why people may split

Progressives worry about honoree's full record; conservatives assume appropriateness

Watch point

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a concise and well-formed commemorative naming provision: it clearly states the purpose, supplies explicit naming language, and addresses references in law and official materials, while leaving routine administrative actions implicit.

This bill renames the Department of Veterans Affairs community-based outpatient clinic in Lubbock, Texas, as the "General Bernie Mittemeyer VA Clinic." It also requires that any reference to that clinic in federal materials use the new name.

Passage90/100

Narrow, noncontroversial honorific with negligible fiscal or regulatory effect historically has high likelihood of enactment.

CredibilityAligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a concise and well-formed commemorative naming provision: it clearly states the purpose, supplies explicit naming language, and addresses references in law and official materials, while leaving routine administrative actions implicit.

Contention10/100

Progressives worry about honoree's full record; conservatives assume appropriateness

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Likely benefits vs burdens50% / 50%
Federal agencies · Local governmentsTaxpayers · Federal agencies

These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.

Likely helped
  • Federal agenciesProvides formal federal recognition honoring General Bernie Mittemeyer’s service and legacy.
  • Local governmentsMay boost local community pride and veterans' morale through the named facility.
  • Potential benefitCould increase regional public awareness of the clinic and its services.
Likely burdened
  • TaxpayersSmall costs for new signage, stationery, and database updates borne by VA or taxpayers.
  • Federal agenciesAdministrative burden to update federal records, maps, and regulatory references nationwide.
  • Local governmentsNaming choices may provoke local controversy or objections from stakeholders or veterans' groups.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Progressives worry about honoree's full record; conservatives assume appropriateness
Progressive85%

Likely supportive in principle because it honors a person who presumably served veterans or the community.

May seek assurance the honoree's record aligns with civil rights and public service values.

Leans supportive
Centrist95%

Generally favorable as a routine, low-cost naming honor for a VA facility.

Will want procedural assurances about cost and local support, and that the honoree merits recognition.

Leans supportive
Conservative98%

Strongly supportive as a straightforward honor for a local veteran figure and community institution.

Sees it as appropriate recognition of service with minimal government overreach.

Leans supportive
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood90/100

Narrow, noncontroversial honorific with negligible fiscal or regulatory effect historically has high likelihood of enactment.

Scope and complexity
24%
Scopenarrow
24%
Complexitylow
Why this could stall
  • Whether the honoree has public controversies not reflected in the text
  • Potential procedural holds or objections in the Senate
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Progressives worry about honoree's full record; conservatives assume appropriateness

Narrow, noncontroversial honorific with negligible fiscal or regulatory effect historically has high likelihood of enactment.

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a concise and well-formed commemorative naming provision: it clearly states the purpose, supplies explicit naming language, and addresses references in law and off…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis