Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
This bill repeals the firearm transfer tax (section 5811 of the Internal Revenue Code) and makes conforming amendments to related Code provisions. The repeal applies to transfers after the law's enactment.
Progressives emphasize public safety and revenue loss concerns.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a narrowly scoped, legally focused repeal that identifies the primary statutory target (section 5811) and several necessary conforming amendments, with a clear effective date.
This bill repeals the firearm transfer tax (section 5811 of the Internal Revenue Code) and makes conforming amendments to related Code provisions.
The repeal applies to transfers after the law's enactment.
The bill also states it does not transfer authority over National Firearms Act firearms to the Consumer Product Safety Commission.
Narrow and administratively simple but touches a high‑salience, divisive subject and reduces federal revenue without offsets, lowering enactment odds.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a narrowly scoped, legally focused repeal that identifies the primary statutory target (section 5811) and several necessary conforming amendments, with a clear effective date. Its drafting largely integrates with existing Internal Revenue Code structure but contains presentation/formatting issues in amendment text that reduce clarity.
Progressives emphasize public safety and revenue loss concerns.
These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.
Progressives emphasize public safety and revenue loss concerns.
Likely opposed because it removes a federal tax on firearm transfers and could reduce federal revenue.
They would view the repeal as potentially increasing firearm transfers and weakening policy levers tied to public safety, though exact fiscal and safety effects are uncertain.
Mixed view: accepts tax repeal's simplicity and reduced burden, but worries about undisclosed fiscal costs and public-safety implications.
Would seek clarity on revenue impact and administrative effects before full endorsement.
Generally supportive because it eliminates a federal tax on firearm transfers, reducing government burden on gun owners.
Sees repeal as pro‑Second Amendment and a simplification of tax law; fiscal concerns are secondary or acceptable.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Narrow and administratively simple but touches a high‑salience, divisive subject and reduces federal revenue without offsets, lowering enactment odds.
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Progressives emphasize public safety and revenue loss concerns.
Narrow and administratively simple but touches a high‑salience, divisive subject and reduces federal revenue without offsets, lowering enac…
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a narrowly scoped, legally focused repeal that identifies the primary statutory target (section 5811) and several necessary conforming amendments, with a clear eff…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.