Referred to the House Committee on Education and Workforce.
The bill amends Section 9 of the National Labor Relations Act to require that an exclusive employee representative be selected by a secret-ballot election. Certification would require a majority of votes cast in that election and a minimum turnout threshold of two‑thirds of eligible employees.
Progressives emphasize harm to organizing and card‑check abolition
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a clear, narrowly focused statutory amendment to the NLRA that establishes a secret-ballot requirement and a two-thirds participation threshold for recognition of an exclusive representative and sets a 6-month delayed effective date.
The bill amends Section 9 of the National Labor Relations Act to require that an exclusive employee representative be selected by a secret-ballot election.
Certification would require a majority of votes cast in that election and a minimum turnout threshold of two‑thirds of eligible employees.
The amendments apply to elections held six months after enactment.
Narrow but ideologically loaded; administratively simple yet politically contentious—passage probable only with clear majority alignment in both chambers.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a clear, narrowly focused statutory amendment to the NLRA that establishes a secret-ballot requirement and a two-thirds participation threshold for recognition of an exclusive representative and sets a 6-month delayed effective date. However, it omits several implementation and drafting details that are commonly material when altering election procedures.
Progressives emphasize harm to organizing and card‑check abolition
These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.
Progressives emphasize harm to organizing and card‑check abolition
Likely views the bill as a restrictive change that makes union representation harder to achieve.
They will note the higher turnout threshold and mandatory secret ballot could undercut alternative organizing methods.
Sees a mix of procedural clarity and potential for unintended barriers.
Values secret ballots for fairness but worries about an unusually high turnout requirement and practical effects.
Likely sees the bill as strengthening individual voting rights and reducing coerced organizing.
Views secret ballots and high turnout requirements as protections against manipulation.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Narrow but ideologically loaded; administratively simple yet politically contentious—passage probable only with clear majority alignment in both chambers.
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Progressives emphasize harm to organizing and card‑check abolition
Narrow but ideologically loaded; administratively simple yet politically contentious—passage probable only with clear majority alignment in…
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a clear, narrowly focused statutory amendment to the NLRA that establishes a secret-ballot requirement and a two-thirds participation threshold for recognition of…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.