Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources.
This bill adds a restored segment of the Kissimmee River in Florida to the National Wild and Scenic Rivers System as a recreational river, to be administered by the Secretary of the Interior. Federal land within the designated boundaries is withdrawn, subject to valid existing rights, from public land entry, mining claims, and mineral leasing or materials disposal.
Environmental protection and recreation vs federal overreach concerns
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a straightforward statutory designation that correctly amends the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act to list and classify a segment of the Kissimmee River and imposes standard withdrawal language.
This bill adds a restored segment of the Kissimmee River in Florida to the National Wild and Scenic Rivers System as a recreational river, to be administered by the Secretary of the Interior.
Federal land within the designated boundaries is withdrawn, subject to valid existing rights, from public land entry, mining claims, and mineral leasing or materials disposal.
Technically simple and low-cost designation improves chances, but local opposition and procedural hurdles reduce probability.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a straightforward statutory designation that correctly amends the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act to list and classify a segment of the Kissimmee River and imposes standard withdrawal language. It provides minimal administrative hooks but omits operational details commonly useful for on‑the‑ground implementation.
Environmental protection and recreation vs federal overreach concerns
These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.
Environmental protection and recreation vs federal overreach concerns
Likely welcomes the designation as a conservation and restoration milestone that protects river ecology and public access.
May view the bill as a modest, targeted federal role in protecting water and wildlife corridors, while wanting follow-up funding or stronger protections.
Generally favorable to protecting a restored river segment and preserving recreation and tourism benefits, while attentive to practical questions about costs, local input, and implementation.
Sees 'subject to valid existing rights' as a reasonable safeguard but wants clarity on boundary, enforcement, and coordination with state water management.
Skeptical about expanded federal designation and land withdrawals that constrain development and state/local discretion.
May acknowledge recreational economic benefits but worries about federal overreach, regulatory burdens, and precedent for more land-use restrictions.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Technically simple and low-cost designation improves chances, but local opposition and procedural hurdles reduce probability.
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Environmental protection and recreation vs federal overreach concerns
Technically simple and low-cost designation improves chances, but local opposition and procedural hurdles reduce probability.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a straightforward statutory designation that correctly amends the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act to list and classify a segment of the Kissimmee River and imposes stan…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.