H.R. 2592 (119th)Bill Overview

Aviation Medication Transparency Act of 2025

Transportation and Public Works|Transportation and Public Works
Cosponsors
Support
Bipartisan
Introduced
Apr 2, 2025
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Referred to the House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief
Plain-English summaryWhat this bill actually does

Requires the FAA Administrator to publish and maintain a publicly available list of medications and treatments the FAA uses when issuing airman medical certifications. The list must be drafted with specified stakeholder consultation, be user-friendly, show stabilization timeframes, include a “Do Not Issue” list, provide a clinician contact mechanism, and be updated annually.

Why people may split

Left emphasizes preventing stigmatization, especially mental-health drugs

Watch point

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a focused administrative directive that is generally well-specified in terms of required content, responsible actor, and timing, but it omits fiscal/resourcing acknowledgement and leaves some procedural and legal-effect details undefined.

Requires the FAA Administrator to publish and maintain a publicly available list of medications and treatments the FAA uses when issuing airman medical certifications.

The list must be drafted with specified stakeholder consultation, be user-friendly, show stabilization timeframes, include a “Do Not Issue” list, provide a clinician contact mechanism, and be updated annually.

Passage60/100

Narrow, technical, low-cost transparency reform typically fares well; success depends on legislative calendar and absence of competing priorities.

CredibilityPartially aligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a focused administrative directive that is generally well-specified in terms of required content, responsible actor, and timing, but it omits fiscal/resourcing acknowledgement and leaves some procedural and legal-effect details undefined.

Contention25/100

Left emphasizes preventing stigmatization, especially mental-health drugs

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Likely benefits vs burdens50% / 50%
Likely helpedLikely burdened

These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.

Likely helped
  • Potential benefitIncreased transparency about permissible medications for pilots and controllers, reducing uncertainty.
  • Potential benefitClearer guidance may reduce medical certification delays and administrative appeals.
  • Potential benefitImproved consistency across examiners could reduce variable decision-making and inconsistent outcomes.
Likely burdened
  • Potential burdenFAA will incur additional administrative workload and recurring costs to maintain and consult on the list.
  • Potential burdenA published list could be interpreted as rigid guidance, constraining individualized clinical judgment.
  • Potential burdenProviders and airmen may face compliance burdens if recommendations conflict with standard clinical care.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Left emphasizes preventing stigmatization, especially mental-health drugs
Progressive90%

Likely supportive because the bill increases transparency around health standards for airmen and can improve access to clear medical guidance.

Will push for inclusive stakeholder input and protections so the list doesn’t become a tool to deny necessary care, especially for mental-health medications.

Leans supportive
Centrist80%

Generally favorable as a pragmatic transparency and safety measure with limited scope.

Wants clarity on implementation, timelines, costs, and appeals to avoid unintended certification delays or administrative backlog.

Leans supportive
Conservative60%

Cautiously supportive of transparency but concerned about new bureaucratic obligations and potential negative effects on workforce flexibility.

Prefers physician judgment and minimal added federal mandates or liabilities for the FAA.

Split reaction
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood60/100

Narrow, technical, low-cost transparency reform typically fares well; success depends on legislative calendar and absence of competing priorities.

Scope and complexity
24%
Scopenarrow
24%
Complexitylow
Why this could stall
  • No cost estimate or estimated FAA workload provided
  • Level of support from medical community and pilot organizations unknown
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Left emphasizes preventing stigmatization, especially mental-health drugs

Narrow, technical, low-cost transparency reform typically fares well; success depends on legislative calendar and absence of competing prio…

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a focused administrative directive that is generally well-specified in terms of required content, responsible actor, and timing, but it omits fiscal/resourcing ack…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis