Referred to the House Committee on Appropriations.
This bill provides continuing, interim appropriations "such sums as necessary" for the Coast Guard Retired Serviceman’s Family Protection and Survivor Benefits Plans for each fiscal year after FY2024. Funding is to be provided at the same rate, terms, and conditions as the most recent full-year appropriations law (Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2021).
All agree on preserving survivor payments; disagreement centers on fiscal formality.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a narrowly scoped procedural/housekeeping measure that provides interim appropriations for a specific Coast Guard survivor benefits program by tying authority to prior appropriations law and including a clause to handle subsequent appropriations.
This bill provides continuing, interim appropriations "such sums as necessary" for the Coast Guard Retired Serviceman’s Family Protection and Survivor Benefits Plans for each fiscal year after FY2024.
Funding is to be provided at the same rate, terms, and conditions as the most recent full-year appropriations law (Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2021).
If a later appropriation that covers these plans is enacted, expenditures under this Act are charged to that appropriation and interim funds cease to be available after enactment.
A narrow, administrative funding continuation for Coast Guard survivor benefits is low-conflict and commonly enacted, though open-ended funding and procedural barriers add modest uncertainty.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a narrowly scoped procedural/housekeeping measure that provides interim appropriations for a specific Coast Guard survivor benefits program by tying authority to prior appropriations law and including a clause to handle subsequent appropriations.
All agree on preserving survivor payments; disagreement centers on fiscal formality.
These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.
All agree on preserving survivor payments; disagreement centers on fiscal formality.
Likely supportive because the bill preserves survivor payments to families of Coast Guard retirees and prevents benefit interruptions.
It aligns with priorities for protecting veterans, survivors, and social safety net continuity.
Speculative: may wish the bill also expanded benefits or included stronger protections.
Generally supportive as a pragmatic stopgap to ensure payments continue and avoid harm.
Sees the bill as procedural and narrowly tailored, but wants clear fiscal accounting and a prompt move to regular appropriations.
Views long-term budget impact as modest but worth monitoring.
Likely generally supportive because it continues payments to Coast Guard survivors, a narrow government responsibility.
However, may object to the open-ended "such sums as necessary" phrasing and lack of offsets.
Prefers temporary, tightly limited extensions and fiscal clarity.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
A narrow, administrative funding continuation for Coast Guard survivor benefits is low-conflict and commonly enacted, though open-ended funding and procedural barriers add modest uncertainty.
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
All agree on preserving survivor payments; disagreement centers on fiscal formality.
A narrow, administrative funding continuation for Coast Guard survivor benefits is low-conflict and commonly enacted, though open-ended fun…
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a narrowly scoped procedural/housekeeping measure that provides interim appropriations for a specific Coast Guard survivor benefits program by tying authority to p…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.