H.R. 2638 (119th)Bill Overview

Women in Agriculture Act

Agriculture and Food|Agriculture and Food
Cosponsors
Support
Bipartisan
Introduced
Apr 3, 2025
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Referred to the Subcommittee on Conservation, Research, and Biotechnology.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief
Plain-English summaryWhat this bill actually does

The bill creates a Women Farmers and Ranchers Liaison position at USDA to provide outreach, application assistance, advocacy, and annual public reporting on program delivery to woman-owned agricultural operations. It authorizes the Liaison to contract for research, training, and mentoring, adds ergonomic equipment research as a priority area, and gives selection priority for certain loans and grants to applicants addressing childcare in rural agricultural communities.

Why people may split

Liberals emphasize equity, transparency, and targeted supports for women farmers

Watch point

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a primarily administrative measure that is reasonably well-constructed in statutory integration, defined duties, and reporting requirements, but it lacks fiscal authorizations, definitional clarity, and safeguards that would make execution and accountability more robust.

The bill creates a Women Farmers and Ranchers Liaison position at USDA to provide outreach, application assistance, advocacy, and annual public reporting on program delivery to woman-owned agricultural operations.

It authorizes the Liaison to contract for research, training, and mentoring, adds ergonomic equipment research as a priority area, and gives selection priority for certain loans and grants to applicants addressing childcare in rural agricultural communities.

The Secretary may staff the Liaison, and the bill amends authority provisions to include this new position.

Passage45/100

Administrative, narrowly targeted measures have plausible paths to enactment, but gender-priority language and Senate hurdles temper likelihood.

CredibilityPartially aligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a primarily administrative measure that is reasonably well-constructed in statutory integration, defined duties, and reporting requirements, but it lacks fiscal authorizations, definitional clarity, and safeguards that would make execution and accountability more robust.

Contention65/100

Liberals emphasize equity, transparency, and targeted supports for women farmers

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Likely benefits vs burdens50% / 50%
Likely helpedLikely burdened

These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.

Likely helped
  • Potential benefitMay increase women farmers' access to USDA grants, loans, and technical assistance through targeted outreach and applic…
  • Potential benefitAnnual, disaggregated reporting would improve transparency about funding distributions and gender disparities in agricu…
  • Potential benefitContracts for training, mentoring, and internships could strengthen skills, networks, and business viability for women…
Likely burdened
  • Potential burdenEstablishing a new liaison and reporting duties will increase administrative costs and require additional USDA staffing.
  • Potential burdenPrioritizing childcare and women-focused programs may redirect limited grant and loan funds away from other applicants…
  • Potential burdenNew data collection and annual disaggregated reporting could impose compliance burdens on USDA and applicants.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Liberals emphasize equity, transparency, and targeted supports for women farmers
Progressive90%

Overall supportive as a targeted equity intervention.

Views the Liaison, reporting requirements, ergonomic research, and childcare priority as corrective steps for historically underserved women farmers.

Leans supportive
Centrist70%

Generally favorable but pragmatic.

Appreciates transparency and modest targeted support, but wants clarity on costs, overlap, and measurable outcomes.

Leans supportive
Conservative20%

Skeptical of creating a new federal office and priority preferences.

Concerns focus on government expansion, potential favoritism, and added bureaucratic costs.

Likely resistant
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood45/100

Administrative, narrowly targeted measures have plausible paths to enactment, but gender-priority language and Senate hurdles temper likelihood.

Scope and complexity
52%
Scopemoderate
24%
Complexitylow
Why this could stall
  • Estimated fiscal cost and appropriation needs are not specified
  • Potential objections to gender-based program preferences
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Liberals emphasize equity, transparency, and targeted supports for women farmers

Administrative, narrowly targeted measures have plausible paths to enactment, but gender-priority language and Senate hurdles temper likeli…

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a primarily administrative measure that is reasonably well-constructed in statutory integration, defined duties, and reporting requirements, but it lacks fiscal au…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis