H.R. 2652 (119th)Bill Overview

Bring Entrepreneurial Advancements To Consumers Here In North America Act

Taxation|Taxation
Sponsor
Cosponsors
Support
Republican
Introduced
Apr 3, 2025
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief
Plain-English summaryWhat this bill actually does

The bill (BATCNA Act) adds tax incentives to encourage U.S. reshoring of manufacturing. It creates a new 20-year accelerated depreciation category and bonus-depreciation eligibility for nonresidential property acquired for qualifying relocations, excludes gain on certain dispositions tied to such relocations, and makes 100% bonus (full) expensing permanent for qualified property.

Why people may split

Progressives stress redistribution, labor and environmental safeguards

Watch point

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a substantive tax-policy measure that is constructed with clear statutory amendments and definitions, enabling the intended tax treatments to be applied.

The bill (BATCNA Act) adds tax incentives to encourage U.S. reshoring of manufacturing.

It creates a new 20-year accelerated depreciation category and bonus-depreciation eligibility for nonresidential property acquired for qualifying relocations, excludes gain on certain dispositions tied to such relocations, and makes 100% bonus (full) expensing permanent for qualified property.

Effective dates apply to property placed in service or sales/exchanges after enactment, with technical conforming edits to section 168(k).

Passage35/100

Technically narrow but fiscally costly; could be enacted as part of larger tax/omnibus compromise but unlikely alone without offsets.

CredibilityPartially aligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a substantive tax-policy measure that is constructed with clear statutory amendments and definitions, enabling the intended tax treatments to be applied. It integrates cleanly into the Internal Revenue Code through explicit edits and a new section.

Contention70/100

Progressives stress redistribution, labor and environmental safeguards

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Likely benefits vs burdens50% / 50%
Likely helpedFederal agencies · Workers

These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.

Likely helped
  • Potential benefitIncreases after-tax returns for firms investing in U.S. manufacturing assets, improving project cash flows.
  • Potential benefitCreates demand for construction and equipment installation, likely boosting related jobs in the near term.
  • Potential benefitEncourages reshoring of production by lowering the upfront cost of establishing U.S. facilities.
Likely burdened
  • Federal agenciesReduces federal tax revenues, potentially increasing deficits or crowding out other spending priorities.
  • WorkersGives larger benefit to capital-intensive firms and owners of assets relative to labor-paid wages.
  • CommunitiesCould incentivize relocations without addressing environmental permitting or community impacts from new facilities.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Progressives stress redistribution, labor and environmental safeguards
Progressive35%

Likely skeptical overall: welcomes policies that bring jobs home but worries this is an un-targeted corporate tax benefit.

The permanent 100% expensing and depreciation changes are effectively business tax cuts without worker, environmental, or domestic-content safeguards.

Support would depend on added labor, environmental, and job-creation accountability provisions.

Likely resistant
Centrist60%

Cautiously favorable: sees practical value in incentivizing reshoring and faster investment, but worries about fiscal cost and program design.

Wants measurable outcomes, sunset or phase-ins, and revenue offsets or auditing to prevent abuse.

Would consider supporting with targeted guardrails and transparency.

Split reaction
Conservative90%

Strongly supportive: views the bill as pro-growth tax reform that lowers the cost of investing in U.S. manufacturing.

Permanent full expensing and accelerated treatment for reshoring align with market incentives and competitiveness goals.

Will favor minimal additional regulation or offsets that undermine incentives.

Leans supportive
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood35/100

Technically narrow but fiscally costly; could be enacted as part of larger tax/omnibus compromise but unlikely alone without offsets.

Scope and complexity
52%
Scopemoderate
52%
Complexitymedium
Why this could stall
  • No CBO cost estimate included
  • Scale of taxpayer uptake and revenue loss uncertain
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Progressives stress redistribution, labor and environmental safeguards

Technically narrow but fiscally costly; could be enacted as part of larger tax/omnibus compromise but unlikely alone without offsets.

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a substantive tax-policy measure that is constructed with clear statutory amendments and definitions, enabling the intended tax treatments to be applied. It integr…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis