H.R. 2657 (119th)Bill Overview

Sammy’s Law

Science, Technology, Communications|Business recordsChild safety and welfare
Cosponsors
Support
Bipartisan
Introduced
Apr 3, 2025
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief
Plain-English summaryWhat this bill actually does

This bill ("Sammy’s Law") requires very large social media platforms to provide real-time APIs that allow a child (13+) or a parent/legal guardian to delegate management of a child’s account and hourly user-data transfers to registered third-party safety software providers. It establishes registration, security, U.S.-only data and storage requirements, annual independent audits, permitted disclosure rules, and FTC enforcement and guidance.

Why people may split

Child-safety empowerment versus concerns about private-sector data access

Watch point

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a detailed substantive policy measure that defines obligations for large social media platforms and a regulatory regime for third-party safety software providers, with substantial integration into the FTC enforcement framework and multiple accountability mechanisms.

This bill ("Sammy’s Law") requires very large social media platforms to provide real-time APIs that allow a child (13+) or a parent/legal guardian to delegate management of a child’s account and hourly user-data transfers to registered third-party safety software providers.

It establishes registration, security, U.S.-only data and storage requirements, annual independent audits, permitted disclosure rules, and FTC enforcement and guidance.

The bill limits permitted state laws on requiring such APIs, provides indemnification for platforms that comply, and becomes effective when the FTC issues implementing guidance.

Passage40/100

Child‑protection objective helps, but technical complexity, industry resistance, legal risks, and federal preemption reduce likelihood.

CredibilityPartially aligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a detailed substantive policy measure that defines obligations for large social media platforms and a regulatory regime for third-party safety software providers, with substantial integration into the FTC enforcement framework and multiple accountability mechanisms. It includes clear definitions, specific registration and audit requirements, permitted disclosure rules, and timelines for agency action.

Contention62/100

Child-safety empowerment versus concerns about private-sector data access

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Likely benefits vs burdens50% / 50%
Likely helpedLikely burdened

These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.

Likely helped
  • Potential benefitEmpowers parents and guardians to delegate management of children’s platform accounts to vetted safety services.
  • Potential benefitFacilitates faster detection and mitigation of harms like cyberbullying, trafficking, and self-harm risks.
  • Potential benefitCreates a regulated market opportunity for third-party safety software firms and related service jobs.
Likely burdened
  • Potential burdenImposes engineering, compliance, and ongoing security costs on covered platforms to build and maintain real-time APIs.
  • Potential burdenIncreases aggregate risk surface by enabling frequent transfers of children’s user data to third parties.
  • Potential burdenExcludes foreign-controlled firms from providing safety services, potentially reducing competition and innovation.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Child-safety empowerment versus concerns about private-sector data access
Progressive80%

Generally supportive; sees the bill as empowering parents and protecting children from online harms while placing oversight with the FTC.

Appreciates data-handling limits, deletion requirements, and audit obligations, but worries about private-sector access to sensitive child data and potential weakening of stronger state protections.

Leans supportive
Centrist65%

Cautiously favorable toward parental empowerment and child safety goals, but concerned about implementation details, compliance costs, and FTC capacity.

Wants clearer technical standards, predictable costs for platforms, and safeguards to prevent security breaches or mission creep.

Split reaction
Conservative20%

Likely opposed overall, viewing the bill as federal overreach that forces private companies to build APIs and share user data.

Also objects to heavy FTC regulation, registration mandates, and constraints on business operations; some may approve the U.S.-only provider rule on security grounds, but not enough to offset other concerns.

Likely resistant
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood40/100

Child‑protection objective helps, but technical complexity, industry resistance, legal risks, and federal preemption reduce likelihood.

Scope and complexity
52%
Scopemoderate
86%
Complexityhigh
Why this could stall
  • No cost estimate or federal workload projection provided
  • FTC capacity and timing for guidance and enforcement
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Child-safety empowerment versus concerns about private-sector data access

Child‑protection objective helps, but technical complexity, industry resistance, legal risks, and federal preemption reduce likelihood.

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a detailed substantive policy measure that defines obligations for large social media platforms and a regulatory regime for third-party safety software providers,…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis