H.R. 2666 (119th)Bill Overview

CBO Scoring Accountability Act

Economics and Public Finance|Economics and Public Finance
Sponsor
Cosponsors
Support
Republican
Introduced
Apr 7, 2025
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Referred to the House Committee on the Budget.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief
Plain-English summaryWhat this bill actually does

The bill amends the Congressional Budget and Impoundment Control Act of 1974 to require the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) to produce annual analyses for the first ten years after enactment of any "major legislation." Each analysis must estimate costs and revenue changes, compare those figures to prior CBO estimates, and update projections. If any provision shows a discrepancy of 10 percent or more versus previous estimates, the Director must report to Congress explaining the cause.

Why people may split

All favor transparency, differ on politicization risk severity

Watch point

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill provides a clear, narrowly framed reporting mandate with well-defined outputs, timing, and a numerical threshold for coverage.

The bill amends the Congressional Budget and Impoundment Control Act of 1974 to require the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) to produce annual analyses for the first ten years after enactment of any "major legislation." Each analysis must estimate costs and revenue changes, compare those figures to prior CBO estimates, and update projections.

If any provision shows a discrepancy of 10 percent or more versus previous estimates, the Director must report to Congress explaining the cause.

Federal agencies must provide requested information, and "major legislation" is defined as measures affecting outlays or receipts at least 0.25% of current projected GDP for that year.

Passage45/100

Narrow, low-cost oversight measure with bipartisan potential but faces Senateprocedural and politicization concerns; implementation costs unclear.

CredibilityPartially aligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill provides a clear, narrowly framed reporting mandate with well-defined outputs, timing, and a numerical threshold for coverage. It integrates cleanly into the existing statutory framework and assigns responsibility to the CBO Director.

Contention40/100

All favor transparency, differ on politicization risk severity

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Likely benefits vs burdens50% / 50%
Likely helpedFederal agencies

These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.

Likely helped
  • Potential benefitImproves fiscal transparency by comparing enacted-law outcomes to prior CBO estimates and publishing results publicly.
  • Potential benefitHelps lawmakers identify recurring scoring errors and refine future budgetary assumptions and models.
  • Potential benefitProvides updated cost and revenue estimates that can inform subsequent budget decisions and deficit projections.
Likely burdened
  • Potential burdenCreates additional workload for CBO that may require more funding or staff to meet reporting demands.
  • Federal agenciesImposes new reporting and data-provision burdens on federal departments and agencies.
  • Potential burdenRetrospective findings could be politically framed or used to challenge enacted policy decisions.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

All favor transparency, differ on politicization risk severity
Progressive65%

Likely cautiously supportive of stronger retrospective analysis and transparency, while concerned about potential politicization of CBO.

Would welcome better information about real program impacts, but worry about misuse to discredit social programs.

Split reaction
Centrist80%

Generally supportive as a pragmatic accountability measure that improves budgeting accuracy.

Will raise questions about resources, feasibility, and the choice of thresholds and reporting timelines.

Leans supportive
Conservative90%

Likely supportive as a transparency and accountability tool to expose scoring errors and deter unchecked spending.

May prefer stronger enforcement or public framing highlighting discrepancies.

Leans supportive
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood45/100

Narrow, low-cost oversight measure with bipartisan potential but faces Senateprocedural and politicization concerns; implementation costs unclear.

Scope and complexity
24%
Scopenarrow
24%
Complexitylow
Why this could stall
  • No legislative cost estimate or CBO workload impact provided
  • How CBO will measure "actual costs" and attribute effects to legislation
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

All favor transparency, differ on politicization risk severity

Narrow, low-cost oversight measure with bipartisan potential but faces Senateprocedural and politicization concerns; implementation costs u…

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill provides a clear, narrowly framed reporting mandate with well-defined outputs, timing, and a numerical threshold for coverage. It integrates cleanly into the existing…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis