H.R. 2676 (119th)Bill Overview

No Union Time on the Taxpayer’s Dime Act

Government Operations and Politics|Government Operations and Politics
Sponsor
Cosponsors
Support
Republican
Introduced
Apr 7, 2025
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageIntroduced

Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR H1467-1468)

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief
Plain-English summaryWhat this bill actually does

This bill amends 5 U.S.C. §7131 to eliminate “official time,” requiring any federal employee activities related to labor organization business to occur while the employee is in a non-duty status. It also makes a clerical change to the table of sections.

Why people may split

Progressives emphasize weakened employee representation and safety risks.

Watch point

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a straightforward substantive statutory amendment that clearly states its objective and achieves that objective by replacing the existing text of 5 U.S.C. §7131 with a brief prohibition on official time.

This bill amends 5 U.S.C. §7131 to eliminate “official time,” requiring any federal employee activities related to labor organization business to occur while the employee is in a non-duty status.

It also makes a clerical change to the table of sections.

Passage35/100

Technically simple but ideologically charged; likely to clear committee debate in favorable chamber but faces strong opposition and Senate hurdles.

CredibilityPartially aligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a straightforward substantive statutory amendment that clearly states its objective and achieves that objective by replacing the existing text of 5 U.S.C. §7131 with a brief prohibition on official time.

Contention74/100

Progressives emphasize weakened employee representation and safety risks.

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Likely benefits vs burdens50% / 50%
Taxpayers · Federal agenciesLikely burdened

These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.

Likely helped
  • TaxpayersReduces taxpayer-funded time spent on union activities during paid duty hours.
  • Potential benefitPotentially lowers direct payroll costs associated with official time for some agencies.
  • Federal agenciesMay increase time federal employees devote to operational duties during paid hours.
Likely burdened
  • Potential burdenReduces ability of union representatives to perform grievance and disciplinary representation during work hours.
  • Potential burdenMay require union officials to perform representation off-duty, increasing unpaid time burdens.
  • Potential burdenCould increase delays or costs in dispute resolution due to reduced onsite representation.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Progressives emphasize weakened employee representation and safety risks.
Progressive10%

Likely to oppose the bill as an attack on federal employees’ collective representation.

Sees elimination of paid union time as weakening grievance handling and bargaining capacity, with potential harms to worker safety and rights.

Likely resistant
Centrist55%

Mixed view: accepts taxpayer accountability aims but worries about practical consequences.

Wants evidence of cost savings and safeguards so employee representation and dispute resolution aren’t impaired.

Split reaction
Conservative85%

Likely to support the bill as strengthening taxpayer accountability and reducing government-paid union activity.

Views elimination of official time as restoring focus to performing government duties.

Leans supportive
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Still ahead

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood35/100

Technically simple but ideologically charged; likely to clear committee debate in favorable chamber but faces strong opposition and Senate hurdles.

Scope and complexity
24%
Scopenarrow
24%
Complexitylow
Why this could stall
  • Absence of cost estimate or OMB/CBO score
  • Effect on existing collective bargaining agreements and grandfathering
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Progressives emphasize weakened employee representation and safety risks.

Technically simple but ideologically charged; likely to clear committee debate in favorable chamber but faces strong opposition and Senate…

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a straightforward substantive statutory amendment that clearly states its objective and achieves that objective by replacing the existing text of 5 U.S.C. §7131 wi…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis