- TaxpayersReduces taxpayer-funded time spent on union activities during paid duty hours.
- Potential benefitPotentially lowers direct payroll costs associated with official time for some agencies.
- Federal agenciesMay increase time federal employees devote to operational duties during paid hours.
No Union Time on the Taxpayer’s Dime Act
Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR H1467-1468)
This bill amends 5 U.S.C. §7131 to eliminate “official time,” requiring any federal employee activities related to labor organization business to occur while the employee is in a non-duty status. It also makes a clerical change to the table of sections.
Progressives emphasize weakened employee representation and safety risks.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a straightforward substantive statutory amendment that clearly states its objective and achieves that objective by replacing the existing text of 5 U.S.C. §7131 with a brief prohibition on official time.
This bill amends 5 U.S.C. §7131 to eliminate “official time,” requiring any federal employee activities related to labor organization business to occur while the employee is in a non-duty status.
It also makes a clerical change to the table of sections.
Technically simple but ideologically charged; likely to clear committee debate in favorable chamber but faces strong opposition and Senate hurdles.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a straightforward substantive statutory amendment that clearly states its objective and achieves that objective by replacing the existing text of 5 U.S.C. §7131 with a brief prohibition on official time.
Progressives emphasize weakened employee representation and safety risks.
Who stands to gain, and who may push back.
These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.
- Potential burdenReduces ability of union representatives to perform grievance and disciplinary representation during work hours.
- Potential burdenMay require union officials to perform representation off-duty, increasing unpaid time burdens.
- Potential burdenCould increase delays or costs in dispute resolution due to reduced onsite representation.
Why the argument around this bill splits.
Progressives emphasize weakened employee representation and safety risks.
Likely to oppose the bill as an attack on federal employees’ collective representation.
Sees elimination of paid union time as weakening grievance handling and bargaining capacity, with potential harms to worker safety and rights.
Mixed view: accepts taxpayer accountability aims but worries about practical consequences.
Wants evidence of cost savings and safeguards so employee representation and dispute resolution aren’t impaired.
Likely to support the bill as strengthening taxpayer accountability and reducing government-paid union activity.
Views elimination of official time as restoring focus to performing government duties.
The path through Congress.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Technically simple but ideologically charged; likely to clear committee debate in favorable chamber but faces strong opposition and Senate hurdles.
- Absence of cost estimate or OMB/CBO score
- Effect on existing collective bargaining agreements and grandfathering
Recent votes on the bill.
No vote history yet
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Go deeper than the headline read.
Progressives emphasize weakened employee representation and safety risks.
Technically simple but ideologically charged; likely to clear committee debate in favorable chamber but faces strong opposition and Senate…
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a straightforward substantive statutory amendment that clearly states its objective and achieves that objective by replacing the existing text of 5 U.S.C. §7131 wi…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.