Referred to the House Committee on Education and Workforce.
Amends the Elementary and Secondary Education Act to create a federal grant program giving each State funds to establish an anti-bullying task force. State task forces must study bullying in K–12 schools, evaluate local policies and education, track incidents including violence and self-harm, include specified membership (including representatives for LGBTQ+ student support), and produce a public report with findings and recommendations within one year.
Liberal emphasizes protections for marginalized students and transparency
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill clearly defines the problem and establishes the principal structural elements needed for a nationwide set of State anti-bullying task forces and studies (grant program, membership, study topics, and reporting).
Amends the Elementary and Secondary Education Act to create a federal grant program giving each State funds to establish an anti-bullying task force.
State task forces must study bullying in K–12 schools, evaluate local policies and education, track incidents including violence and self-harm, include specified membership (including representatives for LGBTQ+ student support), and produce a public report with findings and recommendations within one year.
Content is modest and administratively focused so relatively favorable odds, but unspecified funding and some ideological touchpoints create uncertainty.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill clearly defines the problem and establishes the principal structural elements needed for a nationwide set of State anti-bullying task forces and studies (grant program, membership, study topics, and reporting). However, it omits major implementation details—most notably any authorization of appropriations or funding formulas, application and award procedures, timelines and milestones, data/privacy safeguards, and federal oversight provisions—which reduces the bill's operational completeness.
Liberal emphasizes protections for marginalized students and transparency
These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.
Liberal emphasizes protections for marginalized students and transparency
Generally supportive: sees targeted, evidence-based state studies and inclusive membership as constructive steps to protect marginalized students.
Views federal grants as appropriate leverage to ensure statewide attention to bullying, mental health, and equitable school climates.
Notes the bill centers often-overlooked groups and requires public reporting.
Cautiously favorable: supports anti-bullying aims and data-driven state reviews but wants clarity on costs, implementation, and measurable outcomes.
Appreciates inclusive stakeholder engagement but worries about administrative burden and inconsistent state follow-through.
Wants guardrails to avoid unfunded mandates and to ensure useful policy recommendations.
Skeptical: supports anti-bullying goals but objects to perceived federal intrusion into state education and prescribed task force composition.
Concerned about mandated inclusion of specific interest representatives and potential curricular or policy influence.
Worries about unfunded federal directives and administrative burdens on states.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Content is modest and administratively focused so relatively favorable odds, but unspecified funding and some ideological touchpoints create uncertainty.
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Liberal emphasizes protections for marginalized students and transparency
Content is modest and administratively focused so relatively favorable odds, but unspecified funding and some ideological touchpoints creat…
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill clearly defines the problem and establishes the principal structural elements needed for a nationwide set of State anti-bullying task forces and studies (grant progra…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.