Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
Creates a Title X Clinic Fund at HHS to expand funding for clinics providing Title X family planning services. Appropriates $512 million annually (FY2026–2035) for grants/contracts and $50 million annually for clinic infrastructure.
Support for expanded funding versus concern about federal spending levels
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill functions as a substantive funding and policy measure that clearly creates a dedicated Title X Clinic Fund with specific annual appropriations and basic conditions; it is moderately well-constructed in establishing authority and sums but lacks many operational, oversight, and allocation details normally expected for a large, multi-year grant program.
Creates a Title X Clinic Fund at HHS to expand funding for clinics providing Title X family planning services.
Appropriates $512 million annually (FY2026–2035) for grants/contracts and $50 million annually for clinic infrastructure.
Funds remain available until expended.
Substantial spending on a contentious reproductive topic reduces standalone prospects; more likely as part of a larger negotiated package or with amendments.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill functions as a substantive funding and policy measure that clearly creates a dedicated Title X Clinic Fund with specific annual appropriations and basic conditions; it is moderately well-constructed in establishing authority and sums but lacks many operational, oversight, and allocation details normally expected for a large, multi-year grant program.
Support for expanded funding versus concern about federal spending levels
These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.
Support for expanded funding versus concern about federal spending levels
Likely strongly supportive.
The bill directs substantial, multi-year funding to expand family planning and clinic infrastructure and requires nondirective counseling, supporting reproductive information access.
They may want stronger language on access for marginalized communities and safeguards against administrative barriers.
Generally favorable but cautious.
Appreciates investment in preventive care and clinics, while wanting clarity on costs, oversight, and interplay with existing Title X rules.
Would seek clearer implementation details and fiscal accountability measures.
Likely opposed or skeptical.
Opposes expansion of federally directed family planning funding tied to counseling that includes pregnancy termination information and referrals.
Concerned about federal overreach and conflicts with conscience and state policies.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Substantial spending on a contentious reproductive topic reduces standalone prospects; more likely as part of a larger negotiated package or with amendments.
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Support for expanded funding versus concern about federal spending levels
Substantial spending on a contentious reproductive topic reduces standalone prospects; more likely as part of a larger negotiated package o…
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill functions as a substantive funding and policy measure that clearly creates a dedicated Title X Clinic Fund with specific annual appropriations and basic conditions; i…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.