Referred to the Subcommittee on Coast Guard and Maritime Transportation.
The bill directs the Secretary of the department housing the Coast Guard to study recreational vessel operator training and report to relevant Congressional committees within 180 days. The study must review Coast Guard Auxiliary and Power Squadron programs, State boating education (including NASBLA), and hands-on programs.
Safety evidence is welcomed by all, but potential federal mandates divide views
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill clearly mandates a focused, substantive study and report with specified topics, responsible official, and a defined deadline, but it omits funding authorization, methodological guidance, and explicit stakeholder or intergovernmental coordination requirements that would aid thorough execution.
The bill directs the Secretary of the department housing the Coast Guard to study recreational vessel operator training and report to relevant Congressional committees within 180 days.
The study must review Coast Guard Auxiliary and Power Squadron programs, State boating education (including NASBLA), and hands-on programs.
It must examine course materials, content, methodologies, assessments, and relevancy to boater risks.
Content is narrowly technical and non-controversial, making enactment plausible, but many study bills stall and it's low legislative priority.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill clearly mandates a focused, substantive study and report with specified topics, responsible official, and a defined deadline, but it omits funding authorization, methodological guidance, and explicit stakeholder or intergovernmental coordination requirements that would aid thorough execution.
Safety evidence is welcomed by all, but potential federal mandates divide views
These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.
Safety evidence is welcomed by all, but potential federal mandates divide views
Likely supportive: sees the study as a practical step to improve boater safety and inform federal and state policy.
Wants attention to equity, access, and affordability when considering any future standards.
Generally favorable: views a targeted study as a sensible, low-risk step to gather facts before policy changes.
Will look for cost estimates, state-federal balance, and realistic implementation details.
Cautious or somewhat opposed: supports boater safety but worries the study is a prelude to federal overreach and erosion of state control over internal waters.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Content is narrowly technical and non-controversial, making enactment plausible, but many study bills stall and it's low legislative priority.
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Safety evidence is welcomed by all, but potential federal mandates divide views
Content is narrowly technical and non-controversial, making enactment plausible, but many study bills stall and it's low legislative priori…
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill clearly mandates a focused, substantive study and report with specified topics, responsible official, and a defined deadline, but it omits funding authorization, meth…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.