Referred to the House Committee on Education and Workforce.
This bill amends Section 117 of the Higher Education Act to expand disclosure requirements for foreign gifts, contracts, and ownership or control of U.S. institutions. It lowers the reporting threshold for foreign sources associated with a defined "covered nation" to any value, while keeping a $250,000 annual threshold for other foreign sources.
Security benefit vs academic freedom and civil liberties tradeoff.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a direct and reasonably specific statutory amendment to section 117 of the Higher Education Act that prescribes new disclosure thresholds and mandatory transmittal of disclosure records to the FBI and DNI, with explicit deadlines.
This bill amends Section 117 of the Higher Education Act to expand disclosure requirements for foreign gifts, contracts, and ownership or control of U.S. institutions.
It lowers the reporting threshold for foreign sources associated with a defined "covered nation" to any value, while keeping a $250,000 annual threshold for other foreign sources.
The Secretary of Education must forward submitted reports to the FBI and Director of National Intelligence within 10 days and must transmit previously received records and investigative records to those agencies within 90 days of enactment.
Content is actionable and security-oriented so plausible, but administrative burdens, university opposition, and Senate procedural barriers reduce odds.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a direct and reasonably specific statutory amendment to section 117 of the Higher Education Act that prescribes new disclosure thresholds and mandatory transmittal of disclosure records to the FBI and DNI, with explicit deadlines.
Security benefit vs academic freedom and civil liberties tradeoff.
These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.
Security benefit vs academic freedom and civil liberties tradeoff.
Likely to view the bill as addressing legitimate national security transparency needs but raising civil liberties and academic freedom concerns.
Support would be conditional on safeguards to prevent overreach, discrimination, and chilling of international academic collaboration.
The retroactive transfer of records and routine forwarding to intelligence agencies are probable red flags.
Views the bill as a reasonable step toward protecting research and institutional integrity while promoting transparency.
Supports the FBI/DNI notification but wants clearer definitions, proportional thresholds, and funding for compliance to avoid undue burdens.
Would look for modest amendments to balance security and academic freedom.
Likely to strongly support the bill as necessary to prevent foreign control and influence in U.S. higher education.
The zero-dollar threshold for 'covered nations' and mandatory FBI/DNI transmittal align with priorities to detect and deter malign foreign activity.
May push for even broader disclosure or enforcement.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Content is actionable and security-oriented so plausible, but administrative burdens, university opposition, and Senate procedural barriers reduce odds.
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Security benefit vs academic freedom and civil liberties tradeoff.
Content is actionable and security-oriented so plausible, but administrative burdens, university opposition, and Senate procedural barriers…
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a direct and reasonably specific statutory amendment to section 117 of the Higher Education Act that prescribes new disclosure thresholds and mandatory transmittal…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.