Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
Requires states that use federal Medicaid funds to pay abortion providers to submit annual reports to HHS and publish them online. Reports must list each federal Medicaid payment amount, purpose, and year-over-year comparison; provider-level abortion counts, gestational ages, and abortion methods.
Privacy vs. transparency: patient confidentiality concerns clash with public spending disclosure
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill establishes a clear statutory reporting obligation on States and an HHS consolidation duty, with defined data elements, timelines, and statutory placement in Medicaid law.
Requires states that use federal Medicaid funds to pay abortion providers to submit annual reports to HHS and publish them online.
Reports must list each federal Medicaid payment amount, purpose, and year-over-year comparison; provider-level abortion counts, gestational ages, and abortion methods.
HHS must compile, summarize, publish, and send reports to congressional committees.
Narrow administrative approach but centered on a highly contentious issue; lacks compromise features and faces significant Senate obstacles.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill establishes a clear statutory reporting obligation on States and an HHS consolidation duty, with defined data elements, timelines, and statutory placement in Medicaid law. It supplies useful specificity about required report contents and responsible entities but leaves out several implementation essentials.
Privacy vs. transparency: patient confidentiality concerns clash with public spending disclosure
These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.
Privacy vs. transparency: patient confidentiality concerns clash with public spending disclosure
Likely views the bill as a transparency measure that nonetheless risks patient privacy and access.
Concerned that provider-level, publicly posted data will lead to stigma, harassment, and reduced care for Medicaid patients.
Sees a legitimate oversight interest in tracking federal Medicaid spending but worries about privacy, legal exposure, and state administrative costs.
Would favor compromise safeguards to balance transparency and confidentiality.
Likely supports the bill as reasonable accountability for federal spending on abortions.
Views public reporting and HHS compilation as tools for oversight and enforcement of existing restrictions on federal abortion funding.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Narrow administrative approach but centered on a highly contentious issue; lacks compromise features and faces significant Senate obstacles.
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Privacy vs. transparency: patient confidentiality concerns clash with public spending disclosure
Narrow administrative approach but centered on a highly contentious issue; lacks compromise features and faces significant Senate obstacles.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill establishes a clear statutory reporting obligation on States and an HHS consolidation duty, with defined data elements, timelines, and statutory placement in Medicaid…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.