- Potential benefitReduces civilian availability of many gas-operated semi-automatic firearms nationwide.
- CitiesProhibits newly manufactured large-capacity feeding devices, decreasing future high-capacity magazine access.
- Federal agenciesPermits Byrne grant funds for buybacks, enabling federally supported firearm removal programs.
GOSAFE Act
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
The bill (GOSAFE Act) creates a federal prohibition on possession, sale, manufacture, transfer, and importation of defined "gas-operated semi-automatic firearms" and large-capacity ammunition feeding devices. It requires the ATF to publish a prohibited-firearm list, creates an approval process for new semi-automatic designs for civilian sale, authorizes mark/record requirements, allows Byrne grant funds for buybacks, establishes penalties, and creates a Firearm Safety Trust Fund funded by ATF taxes and application fees.
Liberal emphasizes public-safety and buybacks; conservatives stress property and rights.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a comprehensive substantive statute that establishes new prohibitions and a parallel administrative regime; it is generally well-structured with defined duties and timelines for the Attorney General/ATF, detailed definitions, and specified penalties, but it omits explicit fiscal estimates and certain operational transition details.
The bill (GOSAFE Act) creates a federal prohibition on possession, sale, manufacture, transfer, and importation of defined "gas-operated semi-automatic firearms" and large-capacity ammunition feeding devices.
It requires the ATF to publish a prohibited-firearm list, creates an approval process for new semi-automatic designs for civilian sale, authorizes mark/record requirements, allows Byrne grant funds for buybacks, establishes penalties, and creates a Firearm Safety Trust Fund funded by ATF taxes and application fees.
Exemptions cover federal, state, tribal authorities, certain legacy firearms lawfully manufactured and transferred before enactment, and limited immediate-family transfers handled via a licensed dealer.
Sweeping, high‑controversy gun ban with significant regulatory and fiscal impacts; legal and political obstacles make enactment unlikely absent large shifts.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a comprehensive substantive statute that establishes new prohibitions and a parallel administrative regime; it is generally well-structured with defined duties and timelines for the Attorney General/ATF, detailed definitions, and specified penalties, but it omits explicit fiscal estimates and certain operational transition details.
Liberal emphasizes public-safety and buybacks; conservatives stress property and rights.
Who stands to gain, and who may push back.
These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.
- ManufacturersNew approval requirements and fees increase compliance costs for manufacturers and licensed dealers.
- Potential burdenBroad technical definitions may cover many existing firearms, creating legal uncertainty and litigation risk.
- Potential burdenCriminal penalties for possession could result in prosecutions for noncompliant owners and secondary-market transfers.
Why the argument around this bill splits.
Liberal emphasizes public-safety and buybacks; conservatives stress property and rights.
Generally supportive; views the bill as a meaningful restriction on high-rate semi-automatic weapons and large-capacity magazines.
Sees ATF authority, buybacks, and funding mechanisms as practical tools to reduce mass-shooting lethality, though may push for stronger enforcement and fewer loopholes.
Cautiously supportive of the bill's public-safety aims but concerned about implementation complexity, administrative costs, and legal defensibility.
Will weigh benefits against enforcement burden and fairness to lawful owners and manufacturers.
Likely opposed; views the bill as a broad federal ban and regulatory expansion that interferes with lawful gun ownership, commerce, and manufacturer rights.
Sees the approval regime and magazine ban as federal overreach.
The path through Congress.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Sweeping, high‑controversy gun ban with significant regulatory and fiscal impacts; legal and political obstacles make enactment unlikely absent large shifts.
- ATF's ability to implement technically complex listing and approval processes
- Potential legal challenges to definitions and vagueness
Recent votes on the bill.
No vote history yet
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Go deeper than the headline read.
Liberal emphasizes public-safety and buybacks; conservatives stress property and rights.
Sweeping, high‑controversy gun ban with significant regulatory and fiscal impacts; legal and political obstacles make enactment unlikely ab…
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a comprehensive substantive statute that establishes new prohibitions and a parallel administrative regime; it is generally well-structured with defined duties and…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.