H.R. 2803 (119th)Bill Overview

Protecting Election Administration from Interference Act of 2025

Government Operations and Politics|Government Operations and Politics
Cosponsors
Support
Democratic
Introduced
Apr 9, 2025
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on House Administration, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for c…

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief
Plain-English summaryWhat this bill actually does

The bill expands and modernizes protections for election records by amending Title III of the Civil Rights Act of 1960 to explicitly cover electronic records, papers, and election equipment; requires preservation and retention rules (with a 22-month reuse exception for equipment if data are preserved); directs CISA, in consultation with EAC and DOJ, to issue guidance including observation protocols; creates expedited federal judicial authority for the Attorney General, a DOJ representative, or a federal candidate to compel compliance; and adds criminal liability for intimidation of ballot processing, tabulation, canvass, or certification activities.

Why people may split

Federal oversight and enforcement versus state election control

Watch point

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a focused substantive statutory amendment that clearly integrates with existing law and establishes concrete legal mechanisms (expanded definitions, preservation duties, guidance requirement, judicial remedy, and expanded criminal protections).

The bill expands and modernizes protections for election records by amending Title III of the Civil Rights Act of 1960 to explicitly cover electronic records, papers, and election equipment; requires preservation and retention rules (with a 22-month reuse exception for equipment if data are preserved); directs CISA, in consultation with EAC and DOJ, to issue guidance including observation protocols; creates expedited federal judicial authority for the Attorney General, a DOJ representative, or a federal candidate to compel compliance; and adds criminal liability for intimidation of ballot processing, tabulation, canvass, or certification activities.

Passage45/100

Substantive but narrow reforms increase enforcement and federal role; may attract some bipartisan support but faces procedural and partisan hurdles in the Senate.

CredibilityPartially aligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a focused substantive statutory amendment that clearly integrates with existing law and establishes concrete legal mechanisms (expanded definitions, preservation duties, guidance requirement, judicial remedy, and expanded criminal protections).

Contention70/100

Federal oversight and enforcement versus state election control

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Likely benefits vs burdens50% / 50%
Federal agenciesLocal governments

These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.

Likely helped
  • Potential benefitClarifies legal protections for electronic records and equipment, improving post-election audit integrity.
  • Potential benefitTargets theft, destruction, or alteration with stronger penalties to deter interference with election materials.
  • Federal agenciesCreates expedited federal judicial remedies enabling the Attorney General or candidates to compel preservation and acce…
Likely burdened
  • Local governmentsIncreases federal oversight of local election administration, raising federalism and state authority concerns.
  • Potential burdenImposes storage and preservation costs on election officials to retain electronic records and equipment.
  • Potential burdenAmbiguous 'reckless disregard' standard could expose officials to criminal or civil liability for honest errors.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Federal oversight and enforcement versus state election control
Progressive90%

Likely broadly supportive: the bill strengthens preservation, accountability, and enforcement for election records and counters interference.

It aligns with protecting voting integrity and enabling federal oversight when local actors fail to preserve critical records.

Leans supportive
Centrist65%

Cautious support with reservations: the bill clarifies preservation duties and enforcement but raises questions about federal intrusion, costs to jurisdictions, and possible increase in litigation.

Would favor clearer standards and funding.

Split reaction
Conservative25%

Likely opposed or wary: while endorsing protection against sabotage, this bill centralizes authority, expands federal enforcement, and could enable politicized suits and observation rules controlled by the Attorney General.

Likely resistant
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood45/100

Substantive but narrow reforms increase enforcement and federal role; may attract some bipartisan support but faces procedural and partisan hurdles in the Senate.

Scope and complexity
52%
Scopemoderate
24%
Complexitylow
Why this could stall
  • Level of support from state and local election administrators
  • How courts will interpret new federal enforcement scope
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Federal oversight and enforcement versus state election control

Substantive but narrow reforms increase enforcement and federal role; may attract some bipartisan support but faces procedural and partisan…

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a focused substantive statutory amendment that clearly integrates with existing law and establishes concrete legal mechanisms (expanded definitions, preservation d…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis