Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in…
This bill raises statutory size thresholds for small modular reactors (SMRs) from 300 to 500 electrical megawatts and aligns related definitions. It directs the NRC and DOE to update guidance, prevents DOE from excluding projects whose single-unit output falls between 50 and 500 MW from certain grid-scale funding, and creates a DOE-led working group to promote SMR commercialization, manufacturing, workforce readiness, and competitiveness, with annual reports through 2030.
Liberals worry about waste, cost, and diversion from renewables
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a concise substantive statutory amendment package that also establishes a focused interagency working group and reporting requirement.
This bill raises statutory size thresholds for small modular reactors (SMRs) from 300 to 500 electrical megawatts and aligns related definitions.
It directs the NRC and DOE to update guidance, prevents DOE from excluding projects whose single-unit output falls between 50 and 500 MW from certain grid-scale funding, and creates a DOE-led working group to promote SMR commercialization, manufacturing, workforce readiness, and competitiveness, with annual reports through 2030.
Narrow, administrative bill with modest fiscal footprints improves chances, but nuclear controversy and need for further appropriations limit certainty.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a concise substantive statutory amendment package that also establishes a focused interagency working group and reporting requirement. The text specifies targeted changes to existing statutes, defines key terms, and assigns concrete duties and membership for the working group.
Liberals worry about waste, cost, and diversion from renewables
These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.
Liberals worry about waste, cost, and diversion from renewables
Likely cautious support mixed with significant concerns.
Views the bill as a technology-forward climate tool but worries about costs, waste, and prioritizing nuclear over renewables.
Generally favorable, seeing the bill as pragmatic industrial policy and a federal facilitation step.
Wants measurable cost, timeline, and safety outcomes before larger commitments.
Broadly supportive of expanding nuclear capacity and industrial competitiveness.
Views reduced thresholds and working group as helpful for energy independence and manufacturing jobs.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Narrow, administrative bill with modest fiscal footprints improves chances, but nuclear controversy and need for further appropriations limit certainty.
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Liberals worry about waste, cost, and diversion from renewables
Narrow, administrative bill with modest fiscal footprints improves chances, but nuclear controversy and need for further appropriations lim…
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a concise substantive statutory amendment package that also establishes a focused interagency working group and reporting requirement. The text specifies targeted…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.