H.R. 2815 (119th)Bill Overview

Cape Fox Land Entitlement Finalization Act of 2025

Native Americans|AlaskaAlaska Natives and Hawaiians
Cosponsors
Support
Republican
Introduced
Apr 10, 2025
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 306.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief
Plain-English summaryWhat this bill actually does

This bill authorizes conveyance of approximately 180–185 acres of Federal surface land in the Tongass National Forest to Cape Fox Village Corporation, waiving the ANCSA core township selection requirement. The surface estate would be conveyed to Cape Fox and the subsurface estate to Sealaska Corporation after a written selection notice; conveyances must occur within statutory deadlines and will be subject to a reserved public access easement and any valid existing third-party rights.

Why people may split

Liberal emphasizes tribal equity and environmental safeguards.

Watch point

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a narrowly tailored substantive statute that modifies existing ANCSA requirements to permit and effectuate a specific land conveyance.

This bill authorizes conveyance of approximately 180–185 acres of Federal surface land in the Tongass National Forest to Cape Fox Village Corporation, waiving the ANCSA core township selection requirement.

The surface estate would be conveyed to Cape Fox and the subsurface estate to Sealaska Corporation after a written selection notice; conveyances must occur within statutory deadlines and will be subject to a reserved public access easement and any valid existing third-party rights.

Passage60/100

Narrow, implementable ANCSA conveyance with limited fiscal impact; some environmental or precedent objections could slow Senate action.

CredibilityAligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a narrowly tailored substantive statute that modifies existing ANCSA requirements to permit and effectuate a specific land conveyance. It is strong on legal specificity and integration with existing law, and it sets concrete timelines and recipient designations.

Contention30/100

Liberal emphasizes tribal equity and environmental safeguards.

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Likely benefits vs burdens50% / 50%
Local governmentsLikely burdened

These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.

Likely helped
  • Potential benefitFulfills Cape Fox and Sealaska ANCSA entitlements, providing final legal resolution of outstanding land claims.
  • Local governmentsTransfers surface land enabling Cape Fox to pursue local development, housing, or community projects.
  • Potential benefitClarifies subsurface title for Sealaska, facilitating resource planning and potential investment decisions.
Likely burdened
  • Potential burdenConveys approximately 180 acres of Tongass National Forest surface land to a private Native corporation.
  • Potential burdenTransfer of subsurface rights could enable resource extraction with potential environmental and habitat impacts.
  • Potential burdenWaiving statutory selection rules may create precedent for other ANCSA alterations and future disputes.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Liberal emphasizes tribal equity and environmental safeguards.
Progressive80%

Likely views the bill positively for correcting an ANCSA entitlement and advancing tribal property rights, while raising concerns about environmental and subsurface impacts.

Support is conditional on protections for public access, environmental review, and subsistence resources.

Leans supportive
Centrist90%

Sees the bill as a narrow, administrative fix that finalizes longstanding ANCSA entitlements and provides clear timelines.

Balances support for tribal settlement with practical concerns about procedural implementation and environmental safeguards.

Leans supportive
Conservative70%

Generally favorable as a property-rights resolution that transfers federal land to Native corporations and reduces federal responsibility.

Some caution about precedent of conveying National Forest lands and ensuring no new federal costs.

Leans supportive
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood60/100

Narrow, implementable ANCSA conveyance with limited fiscal impact; some environmental or precedent objections could slow Senate action.

Scope and complexity
24%
Scopenarrow
24%
Complexitylow
Why this could stall
  • Potential environmental or conservation group opposition
  • Senate holds or requests for amendments or studies
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Liberal emphasizes tribal equity and environmental safeguards.

Narrow, implementable ANCSA conveyance with limited fiscal impact; some environmental or precedent objections could slow Senate action.

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a narrowly tailored substantive statute that modifies existing ANCSA requirements to permit and effectuate a specific land conveyance. It is strong on legal specif…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis