Referred to the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.
The bill bars the Federal Government from awarding contracts, grants, cooperative agreements, or other contract-like instruments to a "special Government employee" (SGE) or certain covered third parties. It exempts SGEs who only serve as members of advisory committees.
Left emphasizes anti‑corruption; right emphasizes overreach and lost expertise
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill clearly establishes a substantive prohibition on Federal awards to special Government employees and specified third parties and requires a short-timed FAR revision, but it lacks detailed implementation, fiscal, and accountability provisions necessary to operationalize a government-wide change of this scope.
The bill bars the Federal Government from awarding contracts, grants, cooperative agreements, or other contract-like instruments to a "special Government employee" (SGE) or certain covered third parties.
It exempts SGEs who only serve as members of advisory committees.
The Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) must be revised within 60 days to implement the prohibition.
Narrow ethics goal gives some appeal, but operational disruption, lack of compromise features, and stakeholder opposition reduce prospects.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill clearly establishes a substantive prohibition on Federal awards to special Government employees and specified third parties and requires a short-timed FAR revision, but it lacks detailed implementation, fiscal, and accountability provisions necessary to operationalize a government-wide change of this scope.
Left emphasizes anti‑corruption; right emphasizes overreach and lost expertise
These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.
Left emphasizes anti‑corruption; right emphasizes overreach and lost expertise
Likely favorable: views the bill as an anti‑corruption measure limiting officials from profiting via federal awards.
Supports restricting awards to SGEs and covered family/organizational ties while noting the advisory committee exception may be too broad.
Cautiously supportive of the bill's anti‑corruption aims but concerned about practical effects on procurement and expertise.
Emphasizes need for clear definitions, phased implementation, and legal vetting.
Likely opposed: sees the bill as federal overreach that limits private sector participation and expertise.
Views prohibition on awards to SGEs and related parties as unnecessary regulation that may harm competition.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Narrow ethics goal gives some appeal, but operational disruption, lack of compromise features, and stakeholder opposition reduce prospects.
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Left emphasizes anti‑corruption; right emphasizes overreach and lost expertise
Narrow ethics goal gives some appeal, but operational disruption, lack of compromise features, and stakeholder opposition reduce prospects.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill clearly establishes a substantive prohibition on Federal awards to special Government employees and specified third parties and requires a short-timed FAR revision, b…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.