Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 280.
The bill amends title II of the Public Health Service Act to make Chapter 40 (Leave) of title 10, United States Code, an additional right or privilege for commissioned officers of the U.S. Public Health Service and their beneficiaries, and repeals section 219 of the Public Health Service Act. In short, it extends the leave provisions that apply to members of the Armed Forces to commissioned Public Health Service officers (and beneficiaries).
Left emphasizes workforce equity and family protections
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a focused statutory amendment that adds Chapter 40 (Leave) from title 10, United States Code, to the list of rights/privileges available to commissioned officers of the Public Health Service (and repeals an older provision).
The bill amends title II of the Public Health Service Act to make Chapter 40 (Leave) of title 10, United States Code, an additional right or privilege for commissioned officers of the U.S. Public Health Service and their beneficiaries, and repeals section 219 of the Public Health Service Act.
In short, it extends the leave provisions that apply to members of the Armed Forces to commissioned Public Health Service officers (and beneficiaries).
Content is narrow and non-ideological which favors enactment; unclear fiscal detail and lack of offsets reduce certainty.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a focused statutory amendment that adds Chapter 40 (Leave) from title 10, United States Code, to the list of rights/privileges available to commissioned officers of the Public Health Service (and repeals an older provision). The bill is clear in purpose and integrates directly into the existing statutory framework through a simple cross-reference and repeal.
Left emphasizes workforce equity and family protections
These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.
Left emphasizes workforce equity and family protections
Likely viewed positively as correcting a parity issue for federal public health clinicians and their families by extending military-style leave rights.
Seen as aligning benefits for uniformed public health officers with armed forces counterparts, supporting workforce stability.
Generally supportive because the bill is narrow and pragmatic: it standardizes leave rules for a specific federal uniformed service.
Would expect scrutiny of costs and implementation details before full endorsement.
Mixed reaction: some conservatives may accept parity for uniformed public health officers, but others will object to expanding federal benefits without clear funding.
Concern centers on precedent and cost, despite narrow scope.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Content is narrow and non-ideological which favors enactment; unclear fiscal detail and lack of offsets reduce certainty.
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Left emphasizes workforce equity and family protections
Content is narrow and non-ideological which favors enactment; unclear fiscal detail and lack of offsets reduce certainty.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a focused statutory amendment that adds Chapter 40 (Leave) from title 10, United States Code, to the list of rights/privileges available to commissioned officers o…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.