H.R. 2857 (119th)Bill Overview

Drain the Swamp Act

Government Operations and Politics|Government Operations and Politics
Sponsor
Cosponsors
Support
Democratic
Introduced
Apr 10, 2025
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Referred to the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief
Plain-English summaryWhat this bill actually does

This bill, titled the Drain the Swamp Act, would give Executive Order 13989 (relating to ethics commitments by executive branch personnel) the force and effect of law. In practice it codifies into statute the ethics commitments currently set by that Executive Order.

Why people may split

Liberal emphasizes stronger anti-corruption and enforceability.

Watch point

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill succinctly states the core legal action (making Executive Order 13989 have the force of law) but contains minimal supporting statutory detail.

This bill, titled the Drain the Swamp Act, would give Executive Order 13989 (relating to ethics commitments by executive branch personnel) the force and effect of law.

In practice it codifies into statute the ethics commitments currently set by that Executive Order.

Passage40/100

Low substantive cost and narrow scope improve prospects, but partisan framing and lack of compromise features reduce viability.

CredibilityMisaligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill succinctly states the core legal action (making Executive Order 13989 have the force of law) but contains minimal supporting statutory detail.

Contention65/100

Liberal emphasizes stronger anti-corruption and enforceability.

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Likely benefits vs burdens50% / 50%
Federal agenciesFederal agencies

These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.

Likely helped
  • Potential benefitCreates statutory ethics rules for executive appointees, making commitments legally enforceable.
  • Potential benefitMay reduce conflicts of interest and regulatory capture by restricting financial entanglements and lobbying.
  • Federal agenciesCould increase public confidence in federal decisionmaking and perceived executive branch integrity.
Likely burdened
  • Potential burdenMay deter qualified private-sector candidates from accepting political appointments due to compensation restrictions.
  • Potential burdenCould prompt constitutional legal challenges related to separation of powers or appointment authority.
  • Federal agenciesImplementation will likely increase agency compliance costs and require additional ethics oversight resources.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Liberal emphasizes stronger anti-corruption and enforceability.
Progressive90%

Likely broadly supportive because codifying an ethics EO into law increases enforceability and reduces revolving-door influence.

May still press for stronger, broader restrictions or clearer enforcement mechanisms.

Leans supportive
Centrist70%

Generally favorable but cautious; supports anti-corruption aims while wanting clear legal language, enforceability, and respect for constitutional limits.

Seeks cost estimates and bipartisan clarity on scope.

Leans supportive
Conservative30%

Skeptical: supports anti-corruption goals in principle but worries codification could be overbroad, politicized, or impede qualified appointments.

Concerned about constitutional and practical effects.

Likely resistant
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood40/100

Low substantive cost and narrow scope improve prospects, but partisan framing and lack of compromise features reduce viability.

Scope and complexity
24%
Scopenarrow
24%
Complexitylow
Why this could stall
  • Exact substantive obligations inside Executive Order 13989
  • Official cost estimate or agency implementation analysis
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Liberal emphasizes stronger anti-corruption and enforceability.

Low substantive cost and narrow scope improve prospects, but partisan framing and lack of compromise features reduce viability.

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill succinctly states the core legal action (making Executive Order 13989 have the force of law) but contains minimal supporting statutory detail.

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis