H.R. 2875 (119th)Bill Overview

Mobile Mammography Promotion Act of 2025

Taxation|Taxation
Sponsor
Cosponsors
Support
Bipartisan
Introduced
Apr 10, 2025
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief
Plain-English summaryWhat this bill actually does

This bill amends the Internal Revenue Code to exempt and refund Federal motor fuel excise taxes for fuel used in highway vehicles designed exclusively to provide mobile mammography services. It adds a new refund provision (section 6427(f)) requiring the Secretary to pay the ultimate purchaser the aggregate tax amount (without interest) and a retail tax exemption (section 4041(n)) so no tax is imposed on such fuel.

Why people may split

Left emphasizes public-health and access; right emphasizes tax precedent and revenue loss.

Watch point

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill directly implements a substantive change to excise tax treatment by adding an exemption and refund mechanism targeted at fuel used in mobile mammography vehicles.

This bill amends the Internal Revenue Code to exempt and refund Federal motor fuel excise taxes for fuel used in highway vehicles designed exclusively to provide mobile mammography services.

It adds a new refund provision (section 6427(f)) requiring the Secretary to pay the ultimate purchaser the aggregate tax amount (without interest) and a retail tax exemption (section 4041(n)) so no tax is imposed on such fuel.

The amendments take effect on enactment.

Passage45/100

Narrow, low-salience health measure with modest fiscal impact; most likely to advance if bundled into larger tax/health package.

CredibilityPartially aligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill directly implements a substantive change to excise tax treatment by adding an exemption and refund mechanism targeted at fuel used in mobile mammography vehicles. The core legal change is stated succinctly and integrates by directly amending two relevant Internal Revenue Code sections.

Contention45/100

Left emphasizes public-health and access; right emphasizes tax precedent and revenue loss.

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Likely benefits vs burdens50% / 50%
Federal agenciesFederal agencies

These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.

Likely helped
  • Federal agenciesLowers fuel operating costs for mobile mammography providers by refunding federal fuel excise taxes.
  • Potential benefitReduces net operating expenses, potentially enabling more frequent or sustained screening services.
  • Potential benefitImproves access to breast cancer screening in rural and underserved communities.
Likely burdened
  • Federal agenciesReduces federal excise tax revenue, decreasing Treasury receipts.
  • Potential burdenCreates potential for fraud or misclassification of vehicles to claim fuel refunds.
  • Potential burdenAdds administrative burden on IRS to verify "designed exclusively" eligibility and process refunds.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Left emphasizes public-health and access; right emphasizes tax precedent and revenue loss.
Progressive90%

Likely broadly favorable.

The bill reduces operating costs for mobile mammography units and may expand screening access for underserved populations.

It aligns with preventive health and equity goals, though implementation details matter.

Leans supportive
Centrist75%

Generally supportive but cautious.

The bill targets a specific public-health need with a narrow tax relief, yet raises questions about fiscal impact, administrative verification, and precedent for targeted exemptions.

Leans supportive
Conservative40%

Cautiously critical.

While sympathetic to expanding screening access, this persona worries about tax-code carve-outs, federal revenue loss, and growing precedent for industry-specific exemptions.

Split reaction
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood45/100

Narrow, low-salience health measure with modest fiscal impact; most likely to advance if bundled into larger tax/health package.

Scope and complexity
24%
Scopenarrow
24%
Complexitylow
Why this could stall
  • No official cost estimate or revenue loss provided
  • Definition and verification of "designed exclusively" is vague
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Left emphasizes public-health and access; right emphasizes tax precedent and revenue loss.

Narrow, low-salience health measure with modest fiscal impact; most likely to advance if bundled into larger tax/health package.

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill directly implements a substantive change to excise tax treatment by adding an exemption and refund mechanism targeted at fuel used in mobile mammography vehicles. The…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis