H.R. 2897 (119th)Bill Overview

To amend the Small Business Act to make disaster loans available for damages caused by prolonged power outages, and for other purposes.

Commerce|Commerce
Cosponsors
Support
Bipartisan
Introduced
Apr 10, 2025
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Referred to the House Committee on Small Business.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief
Plain-English summaryWhat this bill actually does

The bill amends Section 7(b) of the Small Business Act to classify prolonged power outages as a disaster eligible for SBA disaster loans. It allows borrowers affected by such outages to use loan proceeds to buy energy resilience systems and replace spoiled food or drink.

Why people may split

Loans vs grants: liberals want more grants; conservatives prefer limited loans

Watch point

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a clear and focused statutory amendment that integrates cleanly into the existing Small Business Act and defines eligibility and permitted uses for disaster loans related to prolonged power outages.

The bill amends Section 7(b) of the Small Business Act to classify prolonged power outages as a disaster eligible for SBA disaster loans.

It allows borrowers affected by such outages to use loan proceeds to buy energy resilience systems and replace spoiled food or drink.

The bill defines "prolonged power outage" with two thresholds: (A) an economic-loss threshold (25 affected units each with uninsured losses of at least 40% of value) for certain loan authorities, and (B) a physical-duration threshold (concurrent outages of at least 48 hours affecting 25 units) for other authorities.

Passage35/100

Content is narrow and administrable so bipartisan path exists, but many technical bills do not clear committee or floor without attachment to larger packages.

CredibilityPartially aligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a clear and focused statutory amendment that integrates cleanly into the existing Small Business Act and defines eligibility and permitted uses for disaster loans related to prolonged power outages. It specifies numeric thresholds and allowable expenditures, and properly redesignates existing paragraph numbering.

Contention55/100

Loans vs grants: liberals want more grants; conservatives prefer limited loans

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Likely benefits vs burdens50% / 50%
Permitting processFederal agencies

These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.

Likely helped
  • Potential benefitExpands SBA disaster loan eligibility to include prolonged power outages, increasing access to recovery funds.
  • Potential benefitAllows financing for resilience equipment purchases, encouraging investments in backup generation and storage.
  • Permitting processPermits payment to replace spoiled food and drink, reducing inventory losses for impacted small businesses.
Likely burdened
  • Potential burdenAdds administrative burden for SBA to verify outage parameters and uninsured 40 percent loss calculations.
  • Potential burdenThe 40 percent uninsured loss requirement may exclude many affected businesses from eligibility.
  • Federal agenciesExpands federal loan exposure, possibly increasing losses to the federal loan program from defaults.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Loans vs grants: liberals want more grants; conservatives prefer limited loans
Progressive70%

Generally supportive because it helps small businesses recover and funds resilience, including renewable technologies.

Concerned loans (not grants) could burden vulnerable businesses and implementation may not prioritize equity or clean solutions.

Leans supportive
Centrist80%

Largely favorable as a targeted, practical fix that clarifies eligibility for SBA disaster loans.

Wants clearer implementation details, cost estimates, and safeguards to avoid overlap with insurance and excessive administrative burden.

Leans supportive
Conservative30%

Skeptical about expanding federal disaster programs to cover private energy equipment and inventory replacement.

Might accept modest, narrowly targeted measures but worries about federal overreach and increased liabilities.

Likely resistant
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood35/100

Content is narrow and administrable so bipartisan path exists, but many technical bills do not clear committee or floor without attachment to larger packages.

Scope and complexity
24%
Scopenarrow
24%
Complexitylow
Why this could stall
  • No official cost estimate or loan exposure analysis in bill text
  • How broadly Administrator will interpret "as determined appropriate"
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Loans vs grants: liberals want more grants; conservatives prefer limited loans

Content is narrow and administrable so bipartisan path exists, but many technical bills do not clear committee or floor without attachment…

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a clear and focused statutory amendment that integrates cleanly into the existing Small Business Act and defines eligibility and permitted uses for disaster loans…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis