Referred to the Committee on Armed Services, and in addition to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in eac…
The bill prohibits any Department of Defense or Executive Office of the President funds from being used to sponsor a parade that specifically commemorates or pays tribute to the current President. It bars such funding for parades sponsored by the Department of Defense, the White House, or the Executive Office of the President.
Liberal emphasizes preventing politicization and saving funds
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill establishes a clear, narrowly tailored statutory prohibition on using federal funds of the Department of Defense or the White House/Executive Office to sponsor parades that specifically commemorate or pay tribute to the current President.
The bill prohibits any Department of Defense or Executive Office of the President funds from being used to sponsor a parade that specifically commemorates or pays tribute to the current President.
It bars such funding for parades sponsored by the Department of Defense, the White House, or the Executive Office of the President.
The restriction applies to funds "appropriated or otherwise made available" to those entities.
Low fiscal impact and narrow scope improve prospects, but partisan symbolism, procedural barriers in the Senate, and lack of compromise features lower overall chances.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill establishes a clear, narrowly tailored statutory prohibition on using federal funds of the Department of Defense or the White House/Executive Office to sponsor parades that specifically commemorate or pay tribute to the current President.
Liberal emphasizes preventing politicization and saving funds
These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.
Liberal emphasizes preventing politicization and saving funds
Generally favorable.
This prevents use of taxpayer-funded military or executive resources for presidential self-promotion and protects civil-military norms.
It also conserves funds for core defense needs and reduces partisan spectacle.
Cautiously supportive of limiting waste and politicization, but wants clearer language and narrow scope.
Sees potential merit in preventing expensive spectacles, while worried about unintended limits on legitimate ceremonial uses or security-driven events.
Likely skeptical or opposed.
Sees this as a congressional restriction on executive prerogative and patriotic displays.
While sympathetic to fiscal restraint, many would view it as limiting legitimate ceremonial uses and an unnecessary politicization of oversight.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Low fiscal impact and narrow scope improve prospects, but partisan symbolism, procedural barriers in the Senate, and lack of compromise features lower overall chances.
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Liberal emphasizes preventing politicization and saving funds
Low fiscal impact and narrow scope improve prospects, but partisan symbolism, procedural barriers in the Senate, and lack of compromise fea…
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill establishes a clear, narrowly tailored statutory prohibition on using federal funds of the Department of Defense or the White House/Executive Office to sponsor parade…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.