H.R. 292 (119th)Bill Overview

GRAPE Act

Agriculture and Food|Agriculture and Food
Cosponsors
Support
Republican
Introduced
Jan 9, 2025
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Referred to the Subcommittee on General Farm Commodities, Risk Management, and Credit.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief
Plain-English summaryWhat this bill actually does

This bill amends the Federal Crop Insurance Act to require the Federal Crop Insurance Corporation (FCIC) to research and develop, or contract for development of, an insurance policy covering table, wine, and juice grapes against losses from freeze events. The FCIC must complete research within one year, make the policy available within 18 months if statutory requirements are met, and report results and policy descriptions to relevant House and Senate committees within two years.

Why people may split

Lib: Emphasizes farmer resilience and climate adaptation benefits

Watch point

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is narrowly targeted and reasonably constructed in terms of assigning responsibility, setting deadlines, and requiring a congressional report, but it omits fiscal, programmatic, and risk-mitigation specifics that would be expected to operationalize a new crop insurance product fully.

This bill amends the Federal Crop Insurance Act to require the Federal Crop Insurance Corporation (FCIC) to research and develop, or contract for development of, an insurance policy covering table, wine, and juice grapes against losses from freeze events.

The FCIC must complete research within one year, make the policy available within 18 months if statutory requirements are met, and report results and policy descriptions to relevant House and Senate committees within two years.

Passage35/100

Substantively modest and uncontroversial, improving chances; but many narrow bills require attachment to larger must-pass vehicles.

CredibilityPartially aligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is narrowly targeted and reasonably constructed in terms of assigning responsibility, setting deadlines, and requiring a congressional report, but it omits fiscal, programmatic, and risk-mitigation specifics that would be expected to operationalize a new crop insurance product fully.

Contention50/100

Lib: Emphasizes farmer resilience and climate adaptation benefits

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Likely benefits vs burdens50% / 50%
Likely helpedFederal agencies

These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.

Likely helped
  • Potential benefitReduces financial risk for grape growers facing freeze-related crop losses.
  • Potential benefitMay stabilize incomes and jobs in grape-growing regions by limiting revenue volatility.
  • Potential benefitCreates contracting, actuarial, and product-development work for insurers and researchers.
Likely burdened
  • Federal agenciesPotentially increases federal crop insurance program costs and fiscal exposure to claims.
  • Potential burdenMay encourage planting in frost-prone areas, raising future claim frequency and losses.
  • Potential burdenAdds administrative and regulatory workload for FCIC, private insurers, and producers.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Lib: Emphasizes farmer resilience and climate adaptation benefits
Progressive80%

Likely supportive.

The bill targets climate-related losses for agricultural workers and small producers, expanding risk management tools for vulnerable growers.

It is modest and narrowly scoped, but progressive advocates would watch implementation and beneficiary distribution.

Leans supportive
Centrist70%

Cautiously supportive if costs and implementation are transparent.

The bill is narrowly focused and practical, but the centrist will want clear actuarial analysis, budgetary impact, and demonstration that private markets or existing programs cannot address the gap.

Leans supportive
Conservative30%

Skeptical.

While it serves agriculture, it mandates federal research and potential new insurance offerings, raising concerns about federal overreach, new costs, and market distortion.

Support may be limited unless cost and scope are constrained.

Likely resistant
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood35/100

Substantively modest and uncontroversial, improving chances; but many narrow bills require attachment to larger must-pass vehicles.

Scope and complexity
24%
Scopenarrow
24%
Complexitylow
Why this could stall
  • Absence of a cost estimate or CBO scoring in text
  • Whether FCIC actuarial requirements under section 508(h) can be met
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Lib: Emphasizes farmer resilience and climate adaptation benefits

Substantively modest and uncontroversial, improving chances; but many narrow bills require attachment to larger must-pass vehicles.

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is narrowly targeted and reasonably constructed in terms of assigning responsibility, setting deadlines, and requiring a congressional report, but it omits fiscal, pr…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis