H.R. 293 (119th)Bill Overview

Making Agricultural Products Locally Essential (MAPLE) Act

Agriculture and Food|Agriculture and Food
Cosponsors
Support
Republican
Introduced
Jan 9, 2025
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Referred to the Subcommittee on Nutrition and Foreign Agriculture.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief
Plain-English summaryWhat this bill actually does

This bill (MAPLE Act) amends the Seniors Farmers’ Market Nutrition Program eligibility to explicitly include maple syrup as an allowed agricultural product. The change modifies 7 U.S.C. 3007(b)(1) to list maple syrup alongside fruits, vegetables, and herbs.

Why people may split

Liberal emphasizes support for small farmers and local food justice

Watch point

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a narrowly focused statutory amendment that is explicit in purpose and precise in mechanism but minimal on implementation detail, fiscal acknowledgement, definitions, edge-case handling, and accountability.

This bill (MAPLE Act) amends the Seniors Farmers’ Market Nutrition Program eligibility to explicitly include maple syrup as an allowed agricultural product.

The change modifies 7 U.S.C. 3007(b)(1) to list maple syrup alongside fruits, vegetables, and herbs.

Passage45/100

Substantively low-risk and bipartisan-appealing, but as a standalone minor amendment it depends on committee attention or attachment to larger must-pass agriculture spending.

CredibilityAligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a narrowly focused statutory amendment that is explicit in purpose and precise in mechanism but minimal on implementation detail, fiscal acknowledgement, definitions, edge-case handling, and accountability.

Contention15/100

Liberal emphasizes support for small farmers and local food justice

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Likely benefits vs burdens50% / 50%
SeniorsStates

These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.

Likely helped
  • Potential benefitIncreases market demand and farm income for maple syrup producers.
  • SeniorsExpands seniors' food choice and cultural dietary options via eligible purchases.
  • Potential benefitPotential modest job support in maple production, processing, and retail.
Likely burdened
  • Potential burdenMaple syrup's high sugar content may conflict with program nutrition objectives.
  • StatesAdministrative costs for states and vendors to add maple syrup eligibility.
  • Potential burdenRisk of program complexity, monitoring, and fraud with new product categories.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Liberal emphasizes support for small farmers and local food justice
Progressive85%

Likely supportive overall as a small, targeted expansion benefiting small producers and seniors.

May raise modest nutrition concerns about adding a concentrated sweetener, while valuing local food economies and farmer support.

Leans supportive
Centrist75%

Generally favorable as a narrow, low-cost technical expansion that aids rural producers and seniors.

Would seek clarity on administrative implementation and any minor fiscal impacts before full endorsement.

Leans supportive
Conservative70%

Cautiously supportive if limited and fiscally trivial; appreciates local farmer support and seniors’ benefits.

May object to expanding federal program scope on principle, preferring state-level discretion.

Leans supportive
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood45/100

Substantively low-risk and bipartisan-appealing, but as a standalone minor amendment it depends on committee attention or attachment to larger must-pass agriculture spending.

Scope and complexity
24%
Scopenarrow
24%
Complexitylow
Why this could stall
  • No Congressional Budget Office cost estimate provided
  • Whether committee will prioritize this standalone amendment
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Liberal emphasizes support for small farmers and local food justice

Substantively low-risk and bipartisan-appealing, but as a standalone minor amendment it depends on committee attention or attachment to lar…

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a narrowly focused statutory amendment that is explicit in purpose and precise in mechanism but minimal on implementation detail, fiscal acknowledgement, definitio…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis