H.R. 2940 (119th)Bill Overview

Advancing Water Reuse Act

Taxation|Taxation
Cosponsors
Support
Lean Democratic
Introduced
Apr 17, 2025
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief
Plain-English summaryWhat this bill actually does

This bill creates a new federal investment tax credit (Section 48F) equal to 30% of qualified investment in certain water reuse projects. Eligible projects include onsite industrial water recycling, replacing freshwater with municipal recycled water for production, and building or expanding municipal recycling systems.

Why people may split

Liberal emphasizes environmental and community safeguards; conservatives emphasize fiscal cost and market distortion.

Watch point

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill establishes a clearly defined investment tax credit for qualifying water reuse projects and integrates that credit into the Internal Revenue Code with concrete statutory definitions and selected anti-duplication rules, but it omits fiscal and administrative detail that would ordinarily accompany a new tax expenditure.

This bill creates a new federal investment tax credit (Section 48F) equal to 30% of qualified investment in certain water reuse projects.

Eligible projects include onsite industrial water recycling, replacing freshwater with municipal recycled water for production, and building or expanding municipal recycling systems.

The credit applies to tangible depreciable property placed in service, allows certain progress-expenditure rules, includes a special rule for transfers to utilities, and sunsets for projects the construction of which begins after December 31, 2032.

Passage45/100

Substantive but narrow tax incentive with practical appeal; passage hinges on committee support and inclusion in larger negotiated package, and fiscal offsets.

CredibilityPartially aligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill establishes a clearly defined investment tax credit for qualifying water reuse projects and integrates that credit into the Internal Revenue Code with concrete statutory definitions and selected anti-duplication rules, but it omits fiscal and administrative detail that would ordinarily accompany a new tax expenditure.

Contention60/100

Liberal emphasizes environmental and community safeguards; conservatives emphasize fiscal cost and market distortion.

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Likely benefits vs burdens50% / 50%
Local governmentsFederal agencies · Taxpayers

These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.

Likely helped
  • Local governmentsEncourages private capital investment in industrial and municipal water reuse infrastructure.
  • Local governmentsCould reduce freshwater withdrawals by firms that switch to recycled municipal water.
  • Potential benefitLikely spurs construction and engineering jobs tied to project installation and expansion.
Likely burdened
  • Federal agenciesReduces federal tax revenue because taxpayers claim a 30 percent investment credit.
  • Potential burdenTends to favor capital‑intensive or larger firms able to finance qualifying property.
  • TaxpayersCreates additional IRS compliance, verification, and administrative burdens for taxpayers.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Liberal emphasizes environmental and community safeguards; conservatives emphasize fiscal cost and market distortion.
Progressive70%

Likely cautiously supportive: applauds federal incentives to cut freshwater demand and expand reuse in industry and municipalities.

Would want stronger environmental justice, reporting, and labor safeguards, and clarity that projects produce real net water savings.

Concerned about the fiscal cost and potential that large corporations capture most benefits without community protections.

Leans supportive
Centrist75%

Generally favorable as a targeted, market-compatible incentive to address water scarcity and resilience in industry and municipalities.

Sees merit in the existing tax-credit structure but wants clear definitions, caps, verification, and fiscal estimates to limit abuse and uncontrolled budgetary cost.

Would seek modest guardrails and oversight to ensure effectiveness.

Leans supportive
Conservative25%

Likely skeptical or opposed: favors water conservation but questions a federal 30% investment tax credit that subsidizes private industry and municipal projects.

Concerned about federal spending, market distortion, and federal intervention into state/local water policy.

Would prefer state-led solutions, direct regulatory incentives, or no subsidy without offsets.

Likely resistant
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood45/100

Substantive but narrow tax incentive with practical appeal; passage hinges on committee support and inclusion in larger negotiated package, and fiscal offsets.

Scope and complexity
24%
Scopenarrow
52%
Complexitymedium
Why this could stall
  • No cost estimate or CBO score included
  • Whether tax committees will prioritize this standalone credit
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Liberal emphasizes environmental and community safeguards; conservatives emphasize fiscal cost and market distortion.

Substantive but narrow tax incentive with practical appeal; passage hinges on committee support and inclusion in larger negotiated package,…

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill establishes a clearly defined investment tax credit for qualifying water reuse projects and integrates that credit into the Internal Revenue Code with concrete statut…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis