Referred to the House Committee on Veterans' Affairs.
This bill amends 38 U.S.C. §527 to require the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to issue regulations establishing mandatory standard practices for any Veterans Health Administration grant or pilot program related to suicide prevention or mental health. Required practices include clear measurable objectives, evaluation methodologies, data collection plans, communication with relevant entities, end-of-program evaluations, and sharing results.
Left emphasizes improved evidence and scaling of successful programs
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill functions as a focused administrative directive that is well-integrated into existing statutory language and provides a clear set of minimum process and evaluation expectations, while delegating much implementation detail to the Secretary via required regulations.
This bill amends 38 U.S.C. §527 to require the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to issue regulations establishing mandatory standard practices for any Veterans Health Administration grant or pilot program related to suicide prevention or mental health.
Required practices include clear measurable objectives, evaluation methodologies, data collection plans, communication with relevant entities, end-of-program evaluations, and sharing results.
The Secretary must issue the regulations within 180 days of enactment, and the standards apply to existing and future programs regardless of establishment date.
Administrative, low-controversy bill has reasonable chance if prioritized or attached to a larger package, but is low priority and lacks funding incentives.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill functions as a focused administrative directive that is well-integrated into existing statutory language and provides a clear set of minimum process and evaluation expectations, while delegating much implementation detail to the Secretary via required regulations.
Left emphasizes improved evidence and scaling of successful programs
These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.
Left emphasizes improved evidence and scaling of successful programs
Likely broadly supportive because the bill promotes evidence-based, transparent approaches to veteran suicide prevention and mental health programs.
Prefers stronger federal standards to ensure programs are measurable and scalable.
Concerned that without dedicated funding and privacy safeguards, the requirements could underperform or become bureaucratic; that outcome is uncertain.
Generally favorable as a modest, procedural reform that increases program evaluation and accountability.
Sees value in measurable objectives and systematic evaluation but worries about implementation details, costs, and flexibility for varied local programs.
Will want timelines, resourcing, and waiver/flexibility options clarified.
Cautiously skeptical: supports veteran suicide prevention goals but worries this creates new federal regulatory burdens and potential overreach into program management.
Concerned about administrative costs, diminished local control, and retroactive regulation of existing programs.
Would demand safeguards on cost, scope, and flexibility.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Administrative, low-controversy bill has reasonable chance if prioritized or attached to a larger package, but is low priority and lacks funding incentives.
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Left emphasizes improved evidence and scaling of successful programs
Administrative, low-controversy bill has reasonable chance if prioritized or attached to a larger package, but is low priority and lacks fu…
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill functions as a focused administrative directive that is well-integrated into existing statutory language and provides a clear set of minimum process and evaluation ex…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.