H.R. 2956 (119th)Bill Overview

DISASTER Act of 2025

Emergency Management|Emergency Management
Cosponsors
Support
Bipartisan
Introduced
Apr 17, 2025
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Referred to the Subcommittee on Economic Development, Public Buildings, and Emergency Management.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief
Plain-English summaryWhat this bill actually does

Requires the OMB Director to submit annually, alongside the President’s budget, a public report summarizing federal disaster-related assistance. The report must cover dozens of agencies and programs, break obligations down by agency, account, disaster, disaster type, and spending form, and be searchable on OMB’s website.

Why people may split

Liberals emphasize equity, mitigation, and holding agencies accountable

Watch point

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill establishes a clear, recurring reporting obligation with concrete high-level content and timing requirements but provides limited operational detail for producing reliable, comprehensive cross-agency data.

Requires the OMB Director to submit annually, alongside the President’s budget, a public report summarizing federal disaster-related assistance.

The report must cover dozens of agencies and programs, break obligations down by agency, account, disaster, disaster type, and spending form, and be searchable on OMB’s website.

The requirement takes effect with the President’s FY2027 budget submission.

Passage60/100

Administrative transparency bill with low ideological conflict; implementation complexity and interagency coordination are main obstacles.

CredibilityPartially aligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill establishes a clear, recurring reporting obligation with concrete high-level content and timing requirements but provides limited operational detail for producing reliable, comprehensive cross-agency data.

Contention35/100

Liberals emphasize equity, mitigation, and holding agencies accountable

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Likely benefits vs burdens50% / 50%
Federal agenciesFederal agencies

These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.

Likely helped
  • Federal agenciesIncreases transparency about total federal disaster-related obligations and program-specific spending.
  • Potential benefitProvides Congress better data to inform appropriations and presidential budget requests.
  • Potential benefitHelps identify where mitigation investments could reduce future disaster costs.
Likely burdened
  • Federal agenciesCreates additional administrative and reporting burdens for OMB and multiple federal agencies.
  • Federal agenciesAggregating inconsistent agency data may produce inaccuracies or limit comparability across programs.
  • Federal agenciesNear-term costs to compile and publish the report could increase agency operating expenses.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Liberals emphasize equity, mitigation, and holding agencies accountable
Progressive80%

Likely supportive because the bill increases transparency about federal disaster spending and could reveal gaps in recovery and mitigation funding.

They will view it as a tool to advocate for equitable disaster response and stronger mitigation investments, while watching for risks that data could be used to justify cuts.

Leans supportive
Centrist75%

Generally favorable as a pragmatic, data-driven measure to improve budgeting and oversight.

Will stress the need for clear definitions, consistent accounting across agencies, and reasonable implementation costs to avoid bureaucratic burdens.

Leans supportive
Conservative60%

Mixed but cautiously supportive on fiscal oversight grounds; welcomes transparency that could reveal waste and reduce duplicative spending.

Concerned about added federal reporting burdens and potential misuse to expand federal programs.

Split reaction
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood60/100

Administrative transparency bill with low ideological conflict; implementation complexity and interagency coordination are main obstacles.

Scope and complexity
52%
Scopemoderate
52%
Complexitymedium
Why this could stall
  • No cost estimate or funding for agency compliance
  • Practical availability of consistent interagency data
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Liberals emphasize equity, mitigation, and holding agencies accountable

Administrative transparency bill with low ideological conflict; implementation complexity and interagency coordination are main obstacles.

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill establishes a clear, recurring reporting obligation with concrete high-level content and timing requirements but provides limited operational detail for producing rel…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis