H.R. 2958 (119th)Bill Overview

Balance the Scales Act

Labor and Employment|Civil actions and liabilityCongressional oversight
Cosponsors
Support
Republican
Introduced
Apr 17, 2025
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 19 - 16.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief
Plain-English summaryWhat this bill actually does

The Balance the Scales Act amends ERISA to require the Department of Labor (Employee Benefit Security Administration) to execute written agreements before providing “adverse assistance” to attorneys in civil actions, and to provide copies of those agreements to employers or plan fiduciaries who may be affected. It mandates an annual congressional report listing such agreements, detailed logs of information shared, communications, and meetings, and requires the Secretary to explain how each agreement aligns with promoting voluntary pension sponsorship.

Why people may split

Progressives emphasize enforcement chilling and claimant harm

Watch point

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a well-specified administrative intervention that prescribes detailed procedures and reporting obligations for the Department of Labor/EBSA before providing specified 'adverse assistance' and requires annual Congress-facing reports with concrete content requirements.

The Balance the Scales Act amends ERISA to require the Department of Labor (Employee Benefit Security Administration) to execute written agreements before providing “adverse assistance” to attorneys in civil actions, and to provide copies of those agreements to employers or plan fiduciaries who may be affected.

It mandates an annual congressional report listing such agreements, detailed logs of information shared, communications, and meetings, and requires the Secretary to explain how each agreement aligns with promoting voluntary pension sponsorship.

The bill also adds a congressional finding emphasizing the policy goal of promoting voluntary employer-sponsored pension plans.

Passage35/100

Procedural, limited-scope bill with moderate controversy; feasible in a receptive House but faces significant Senate and stakeholder resistance.

CredibilityPartially aligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a well-specified administrative intervention that prescribes detailed procedures and reporting obligations for the Department of Labor/EBSA before providing specified 'adverse assistance' and requires annual Congress-facing reports with concrete content requirements. It amends ERISA by inserting a new operational subsection and a policy finding.

Contention68/100

Progressives emphasize enforcement chilling and claimant harm

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Likely benefits vs burdens50% / 50%
Federal agenciesLikely burdened

These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.

Likely helped
  • Federal agenciesIncreases transparency by requiring documents and logs of agency agreements with plaintiff attorneys be reported to Con…
  • Federal agenciesProvides employers and plan fiduciaries advance notice of agency assistance that could create legal exposure.
  • Federal agenciesCreates a record for Congressional oversight of agency interactions with private counsel.
Likely burdened
  • Potential burdenIncreases administrative workload and costs for EBSA to prepare agreements, logs, and annual reports.
  • Potential burdenMay discourage EBSA from sharing information with claimant attorneys, potentially reducing enforcement assistance.
  • Potential burdenCould risk disclosure of sensitive claimant or investigatory details despite redaction limits.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Progressives emphasize enforcement chilling and claimant harm
Progressive20%

This persona is likely skeptical.

They would view the requirement to notify employers and document all communications as potentially chilling DOL enforcement and reducing claimants’ access to evidence.

They will worry about worker protections and whether the changes hinder private civil enforcement under ERISA.

Likely resistant
Centrist55%

A pragmatic centrist will see pros and cons.

They will appreciate transparency and notice to potentially impacted employers, but worry about procedural delays and increased administrative costs for the DOL.

They will weigh whether reporting and notice can be implemented without meaningfully impairing enforcement of plan protections.

Split reaction
Conservative85%

Mainstream conservatives will likely view this positively as restoring balance and protecting employers and plan sponsors from undisclosed government-coordinated assistance to plaintiffs.

They will emphasize transparency, due process for employers, and promoting voluntary retirement plan sponsorship.

Leans supportive
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood35/100

Procedural, limited-scope bill with moderate controversy; feasible in a receptive House but faces significant Senate and stakeholder resistance.

Scope and complexity
52%
Scopemoderate
52%
Complexitymedium
Why this could stall
  • Intensity of organized opposition from labor and plaintiff bar
  • Potential legal conflicts with confidentiality or evidentiary rules
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Progressives emphasize enforcement chilling and claimant harm

Procedural, limited-scope bill with moderate controversy; feasible in a receptive House but faces significant Senate and stakeholder resist…

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a well-specified administrative intervention that prescribes detailed procedures and reporting obligations for the Department of Labor/EBSA before providing specif…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis