Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
The bill requires the Secretary of Homeland Security and the Secretary of Health and Human Services to publish, on their department websites and updated weekly, specified information about individuals unlawfully present in the United States who are processed by U.S. Customs and Border Protection or HHS facilities. Required data include daily counts, countries of origin, ages and genders, U.S. states to which individuals are released or sent, and number and types of criminal convictions, if any.
Progressives highlight privacy, civil‑rights, and juvenile harms.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill establishes a clear, limited reporting obligation but provides only minimal operational detail.
The bill requires the Secretary of Homeland Security and the Secretary of Health and Human Services to publish, on their department websites and updated weekly, specified information about individuals unlawfully present in the United States who are processed by U.S. Customs and Border Protection or HHS facilities.
Required data include daily counts, countries of origin, ages and genders, U.S. states to which individuals are released or sent, and number and types of criminal convictions, if any.
Technically simple and low-cost but politically sensitive; easier in a responsive chamber, harder in a full Senate.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill establishes a clear, limited reporting obligation but provides only minimal operational detail. It names responsible agencies and enumerates data elements and frequency, but omits essential definitional, privacy, methodological, resourcing, and accountability elements necessary for consistent, lawful, and high-quality public reporting.
Progressives highlight privacy, civil‑rights, and juvenile harms.
These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.
Progressives highlight privacy, civil‑rights, and juvenile harms.
Likely skeptical or opposed.
The bill's public data mandate raises civil‑liberties, privacy, and due‑process concerns, and risks stigmatizing migrants and minors.
Support would depend on strict anonymization, aggregation, and protections for vulnerable populations.
Cautiously receptive but conditional.
Supports transparency for oversight and planning but wants clear definitions, privacy safeguards, and budgeted implementation.
Will weigh feasibility, legal constraints, and potential unintended consequences.
Likely supportive.
Values public access to migration numbers and criminal conviction information for public safety and accountability.
May prefer even more granular or real‑time reporting to aid enforcement and local decision‑making.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Technically simple and low-cost but politically sensitive; easier in a responsive chamber, harder in a full Senate.
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Progressives highlight privacy, civil‑rights, and juvenile harms.
Technically simple and low-cost but politically sensitive; easier in a responsive chamber, harder in a full Senate.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill establishes a clear, limited reporting obligation but provides only minimal operational detail. It names responsible agencies and enumerates data elements and frequen…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.