H.R. 2998 (119th)Bill Overview

Secure E-Waste Export and Recycling Act

Foreign Trade and International Finance|Foreign Trade and International Finance
Cosponsors
Support
Bipartisan
Introduced
Apr 24, 2025
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief
Plain-English summaryWhat this bill actually does

The Secure E-Waste Export and Recycling Act prohibits exports and reexports of defined electronic waste, with limited exemptions for tested working electronics, low-risk destroyed counterfeit feedstock, and repaired recalled items. Exporters of exempted items must register with the Commerce Secretary, file detailed export information in the Automated Export System, and provide documentation that the foreign consignee can safely reuse or recycle the items.

Why people may split

Progressives emphasize environmental justice and anti-dumping benefits

Watch point

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a well-structured substantive regulatory measure that defines the covered items, sets a clear prohibition, creates specific exemptions, prescribes registration and reporting requirements, and integrates with existing export-control frameworks.

The Secure E-Waste Export and Recycling Act prohibits exports and reexports of defined electronic waste, with limited exemptions for tested working electronics, low-risk destroyed counterfeit feedstock, and repaired recalled items.

Exporters of exempted items must register with the Commerce Secretary, file detailed export information in the Automated Export System, and provide documentation that the foreign consignee can safely reuse or recycle the items.

The Secretary must modify the Export Administration Regulations to implement the law, which becomes effective one year after enactment, and violations face the same penalties as other EAR violations.

Passage45/100

Technocratic, security-focused bill with modest regulatory cost; likely to attract some industry opposition and procedural Senate friction.

CredibilityPartially aligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a well-structured substantive regulatory measure that defines the covered items, sets a clear prohibition, creates specific exemptions, prescribes registration and reporting requirements, and integrates with existing export-control frameworks. It relies appropriately on the Secretary of Commerce and the EAR/AES infrastructure for implementation.

Contention60/100

Progressives emphasize environmental justice and anti-dumping benefits

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Likely benefits vs burdens50% / 50%
Likely helpedLikely burdened

These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.

Likely helped
  • Potential benefitReduces risk of counterfeit civilian and military components reentering U.S. supply chains.
  • Potential benefitImproves traceability and accountability for exported used electronics through registry and AES reporting.
  • Potential benefitEncourages safer end‑of‑life processing and may reduce environmental harm in importing countries.
Likely burdened
  • Potential burdenImposes new compliance costs and administrative burdens on exporters, recyclers, and refurbishers.
  • Potential burdenCould reduce exports of used electronics that serve secondary markets in developing countries.
  • Potential burdenAdds demands on Commerce to maintain a registry and update EAR within a constrained timeframe.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Progressives emphasize environmental justice and anti-dumping benefits
Progressive75%

Likely broadly supportive because the bill aims to stop environmental dumping and protect supply chains from counterfeit components.

Advocates would welcome tighter controls on e-waste flows but may press for stronger domestic recycling investment and labor safeguards.

They may be cautious about unintended harm to reuse and donation programs without mitigation.

Leans supportive
Centrist70%

Generally favorable because the bill addresses concrete national-security and supply-chain integrity concerns while keeping a defined exemption framework.

Supporters would emphasize the need for clear, implementable rules and predictable compliance costs.

They would seek phased implementation, international coordination, and clarity in the Export Administration Regulations updates.

Leans supportive
Conservative30%

Skeptical due to added federal export controls, paperwork, and potential trade barriers.

Some conservatives might agree with targeting counterfeit military goods but oppose broad restrictions that limit commerce and private-sector reuse.

They would prefer narrower, security-focused measures and streamlined compliance for small businesses and charities.

Likely resistant
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood45/100

Technocratic, security-focused bill with modest regulatory cost; likely to attract some industry opposition and procedural Senate friction.

Scope and complexity
52%
Scopemoderate
52%
Complexitymedium
Why this could stall
  • Absent cost estimate for compliance burdens
  • Industry (recyclers/exporters) support or opposition
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Progressives emphasize environmental justice and anti-dumping benefits

Technocratic, security-focused bill with modest regulatory cost; likely to attract some industry opposition and procedural Senate friction.

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a well-structured substantive regulatory measure that defines the covered items, sets a clear prohibition, creates specific exemptions, prescribes registration and…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis