H.R. 30 (119th)Bill Overview

Preventing Violence Against Women by Illegal Aliens Act

Immigration|Assault and harassment offensesChild safety and welfare
Cosponsors
Support
Republican
Introduced
Jan 3, 2025
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief
Plain-English summaryWhat this bill actually does

The bill amends the Immigration and Nationality Act to make noncitizens inadmissible and/or deportable if they have been convicted of, admit to, or admit committing acts that amount to sex offenses, domestic violence, stalking, child abuse, or violations of protection orders. It references existing statutory definitions (the Adam Walsh Act and the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act) to define those offenses and expands deportability grounds to include sex offenses and specified domestic-violence-related crimes.

Why people may split

Progressives emphasize due-process and victim-reporting risks.

Watch point

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a direct substantive amendment to the Immigration and Nationality Act that clearly identifies new grounds for inadmissibility and deportability and integrates those grounds by editing specific INA provisions and cross-referencing existing federal definitions.

The bill amends the Immigration and Nationality Act to make noncitizens inadmissible and/or deportable if they have been convicted of, admit to, or admit committing acts that amount to sex offenses, domestic violence, stalking, child abuse, or violations of protection orders.

It references existing statutory definitions (the Adam Walsh Act and the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act) to define those offenses and expands deportability grounds to include sex offenses and specified domestic-violence-related crimes.

Passage35/100

Passed House but faces substantial Senate hurdles and legal/administrative objections; moderate enforcement appeal but high controversy.

CredibilityMisaligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a direct substantive amendment to the Immigration and Nationality Act that clearly identifies new grounds for inadmissibility and deportability and integrates those grounds by editing specific INA provisions and cross-referencing existing federal definitions.

Contention75/100

Progressives emphasize due-process and victim-reporting risks.

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Likely benefits vs burdens50% / 50%
Federal agenciesStates · Families

These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.

Likely helped
  • Potential benefitCreates additional grounds to deny entry to individuals with specified sexual or violent offense histories.
  • Federal agenciesEnables DHS to remove noncitizens convicted of sex offenses more readily under federal law.
  • Potential benefitBroadens enforcement scope to include domestic violence, stalking, child abuse, and protection-order violations.
Likely burdened
  • StatesUsing admissions as grounds may raise due-process concerns and risk coerced or unreliable statements.
  • FamiliesLikely increases deportations and potential family separations, adding immigration court and detention costs.
  • ImmigrantsMay deter crime victims, especially immigrant survivors, from reporting or seeking protections.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Progressives emphasize due-process and victim-reporting risks.
Progressive35%

Supports protecting survivors of sexual and domestic violence in principle, but worries the bill prioritizes immigration enforcement over due process and victim safety.

Concerned about the 'admits' standard, potential coerced/confused admissions, racialized policing, family separation, and deterrence of victim reporting.

Sees some public-safety benefits but is wary of expansion of removal authority without safeguards.

Likely resistant
Centrist60%

Generally favors removing individuals who commit serious violent crimes, but seeks clearer standards and implementation details.

Wants to balance public safety with due process, administrative feasibility, and avoidance of unintended impacts on victim reporting and asylum processes.

Split reaction
Conservative95%

Strongly favorable: views the bill as closing loopholes and strengthening immigration enforcement against violent criminals.

Emphasizes protecting women and children and removing noncitizens who commit sex or domestic crimes.

Leans supportive
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood35/100

Passed House but faces substantial Senate hurdles and legal/administrative objections; moderate enforcement appeal but high controversy.

Scope and complexity
52%
Scopemoderate
52%
Complexitymedium
Why this could stall
  • No cost estimate or CBO score included
  • How 'admits' will be applied in practice and evidentiary standards
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

HOUSE · Jan 16, 2025
Final passage✓ PassedParty-line

The House passed this bill. It now goes to the other chamber, and eventually to the President for signature.

What is a final passage?

The final vote on whether the bill becomes law (pending the other chamber and the President).

Yes 66% No 34%
Showing a quick cross-section of legislators, with followed members first when available.
HOUSE · Jan 16, 2025
Send back to committee✗ FailedClose voteParty-line

The attempt to send the bill back to committee failed. The bill continues moving forward.

What is a send back to committee?

A motion to recommit sends a bill back to committee, often as a last-ditch attempt to stop it.

Yes 49% No 51%
Showing a quick cross-section of legislators, with followed members first when available.
06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Progressives emphasize due-process and victim-reporting risks.

Passed House but faces substantial Senate hurdles and legal/administrative objections; moderate enforcement appeal but high controversy.

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a direct substantive amendment to the Immigration and Nationality Act that clearly identifies new grounds for inadmissibility and deportability and integrates thos…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis