Referred to the Subcommittee on Emergency Management and Technology.
Creates a Climate Coordinating Council inside DHS to identify and mitigate cross-functional climate-change impacts across DHS components. The council (minimum 20 members drawn from listed DHS offices) will develop risk-based strategies, recommend organizational or resource changes, oversee implementation of Executive Order 14008 actions, and require annual reports to congressional homeland security committees for ten years.
Lib: emphasizes climate-security preparedness; Conserv: emphasizes mission creep and politicization
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill establishes a broadly specified administrative coordinating council within DHS with defined membership categories, general duties, and a multi-year reporting requirement, but leaves substantial implementation detail, resourcing, and operational authorities unspecified.
Creates a Climate Coordinating Council inside DHS to identify and mitigate cross-functional climate-change impacts across DHS components.
The council (minimum 20 members drawn from listed DHS offices) will develop risk-based strategies, recommend organizational or resource changes, oversee implementation of Executive Order 14008 actions, and require annual reports to congressional homeland security committees for ten years.
Modest chance: technical, low-cost DHS reorganization favors enactment, but climate link raises partisan scrutiny and procedural hurdles in the Senate.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill establishes a broadly specified administrative coordinating council within DHS with defined membership categories, general duties, and a multi-year reporting requirement, but leaves substantial implementation detail, resourcing, and operational authorities unspecified.
Lib: emphasizes climate-security preparedness; Conserv: emphasizes mission creep and politicization
These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.
Lib: emphasizes climate-security preparedness; Conserv: emphasizes mission creep and politicization
Likely supportive: views the council as a necessary, centralized effort to treat climate change as a national security and readiness issue.
Appreciates cross-component membership and explicit duty to develop risk-based strategies and report annually.
Cautiously favorable: sees pragmatic value in coordination and risk-based strategies but worries about duplication, cost, and unclear metrics.
Wants measurable outputs and cost estimates before full endorsement.
Skeptical or opposed: views the council as potential mission creep and a vehicle to advance an expansive climate agenda within DHS.
Concerned about resource diversion from core security functions and new regulatory impulses.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Modest chance: technical, low-cost DHS reorganization favors enactment, but climate link raises partisan scrutiny and procedural hurdles in the Senate.
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Lib: emphasizes climate-security preparedness; Conserv: emphasizes mission creep and politicization
Modest chance: technical, low-cost DHS reorganization favors enactment, but climate link raises partisan scrutiny and procedural hurdles in…
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill establishes a broadly specified administrative coordinating council within DHS with defined membership categories, general duties, and a multi-year reporting requirem…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.