H.R. 3013 (119th)Bill Overview

To amend title 38, United States Code, to increase the authorization of appropriations for comprehensive service programs for homeless veterans.

Armed Forces and National Security|Armed Forces and National Security
Cosponsors
Support
Democratic
Introduced
Apr 24, 2025
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Referred to the House Committee on Veterans' Affairs.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief
Plain-English summaryWhat this bill actually does

This bill amends 38 U.S.C. §2016 to change the authorization of appropriations for comprehensive service programs for homeless veterans. It sets an authorization of $350,000,000 for fiscal year 2025 and authorizes "such sums as may be necessary" for subsequent fiscal years.

Why people may split

Interpretation of open-ended "such sums as may be necessary" authority

Watch point

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a narrowly focused authorization amendment that clearly states its purpose and identifies the statutory provision to change.

This bill amends 38 U.S.C. §2016 to change the authorization of appropriations for comprehensive service programs for homeless veterans.

It sets an authorization of $350,000,000 for fiscal year 2025 and authorizes "such sums as may be necessary" for subsequent fiscal years.

It also updates the prior paragraph language that covered fiscal years 2015 through 2024 to include the new years.

Passage60/100

Substantively modest, bipartisan‑friendly change increases authorization; passage depends on appropriations action and tolerance for open‑ended funding language.

CredibilityPartially aligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a narrowly focused authorization amendment that clearly states its purpose and identifies the statutory provision to change. It provides a specific FY2025 authorization and open-ended authority thereafter but contains a drafting irregularity in the amendment language and omits fiscal quantification and accountability measures.

Contention50/100

Interpretation of open-ended "such sums as may be necessary" authority

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Likely benefits vs burdens50% / 50%
Veterans · Federal agenciesFederal agencies

These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.

Likely helped
  • VeteransProvides a larger statutory funding level for homeless veterans programs in fiscal year 2025.
  • Federal agenciesEnables sustained federal support beyond 2024 through an ongoing authorization mechanism.
  • VeteransMay expand services for unsheltered or at-risk veterans by increasing available program funding.
Likely burdened
  • Federal agenciesCreates an open-ended authorization phrase that could be interpreted as limitless future federal commitments.
  • Federal agenciesIncreases potential federal spending obligations, raising budgetary and deficit concerns for critics.
  • Potential burdenDoes not guarantee annual appropriations, so services may still face funding uncertainty depending on Congress.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Interpretation of open-ended "such sums as may be necessary" authority
Progressive90%

Likely broadly supportive: increased, ongoing funding for homeless veterans aligns with social-justice and veterans-care priorities.

Would welcome the $350 million FY2025 authorization but seek stronger guarantees, oversight, and targeted services.

Leans supportive
Centrist70%

Generally favorable but pragmatic: supports more resources for homeless veterans while wanting fiscal clarity and measurable outcomes.

Sees merit in continuity, but wants cost estimates, oversight, and limits to avoid long-term budget uncertainty.

Leans supportive
Conservative40%

Cautiously mixed to somewhat opposed: supports assisting veterans but wary of open-ended federal spending and program expansion.

Prefers limited, accountable spending and greater state/local or nonprofit delivery roles.

Split reaction
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood60/100

Substantively modest, bipartisan‑friendly change increases authorization; passage depends on appropriations action and tolerance for open‑ended funding language.

Scope and complexity
24%
Scopenarrow
24%
Complexitylow
Why this could stall
  • No CBO or cost estimate included in text
  • "Such sums as may be necessary" creates indefinite fiscal exposure
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Interpretation of open-ended "such sums as may be necessary" authority

Substantively modest, bipartisan‑friendly change increases authorization; passage depends on appropriations action and tolerance for open‑e…

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a narrowly focused authorization amendment that clearly states its purpose and identifies the statutory provision to change. It provides a specific FY2025 authoriz…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis